Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Don't Be A Teacher

Between the teacher bashing led by Barack Obama, teacher layoffs, linking teacher pay and evals to test scores, and the expectation from Bill Gates, Arne Duncan and others that teachers should expect to do more with less and like it, many people have decided against becoming teachers in California:

The number of Californians seeking to become teachers has plummeted by 45 percent over a seven year period -- even as student enrollments are projected to rise by 230,000 over the next decade and as many as 100,000 teachers are expected to retire.

Teaching is clearly becoming a less and less desirable profession for Californians. The number of students enrolled in teacher preparation programs has declined from 77,705 in 2001-02 to 42,245 in 2008-09, according to the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.

Those dismal figures are paralleled by an ever smaller number of teachers getting their teaching credentials in California -- from 24,149 in 2004-05 to 17,797 in 2008-09, the last year for which figures are available.

...

Who will teach our children? That question is rarely asked in the current cacophony of voices, from President Obama's on down, demanding more of teachers, and threatening them with dismissal or replacement if they are unable to close the enduring achievement gap that separates poor, mostly black and Latino students from their more affluent, largely white peers.

"The report puts its finger on a more urgent problem than the need to push out the very small number of teachers who are not as good as we would like them to be, and that is where we are going to get the best quality teachers in our schools that we will need in the future," Richard Zeiger, chief of staff to incoming Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson, told California Watch. (Torlakson along with other education leaders will be at UCLA today at a forum on education finances hosted by Gov.-elect Jerry Brown.)

But as Zeiger points out, "the problem from a political standpoint is that it is very hard to pivot from the notion that we are currently laying off teachers to having to prepare for a new batch of teachers in the future."

There are multiple reasons for the declining appeal of teaching to Californians, said Patrick Shields, director of research for SRI International, which conducted the research for the report. Principle among them are horrendous "market forces" that have led to 30,000 teachers being laid off in California over the last two years alone -- with novice teachers being the most likely to have gotten their walking papers.

Adding to the pipeline problem are budget cuts to the California State University system, which awards half of all teacher credentials in the state, and which has had to cap enrollments in teacher training programs.

The impact of other factors is harder to pinpoint, such as the intense pressures on teachers to increase test scores under No Child Left Behind over the past decade, and more recent moves to link teacher evaluation to test scores of students.

Because of budget cuts, teachers are expected to do more with less, typically teaching in larger classes, with fewer counseling and other staff to help out with hard-to-teach children. All this comes on top of reductions in salaries and benefits in the form of unpaid furlough days, increased health care premiums, and other cost-saving measures.

"Teachers are coping with lower compensation, fewer resources and increasing expectations of student achievement," said Shields. "It is a reasonable expectation that a college sophomore or junior might think 'I might not even get a job, so perhaps I should look for another career.'"

Under normal economic conditions, with rising student enrollments and more teacher retirements, districts would hire more teachers to fill the need. But these are not normal times. Because of shrinking revenues, school districts may simply decide to raise class sizes rather than hire new teachers, said Shields, a trend that is already underway across the state.

The Center for Teaching and Learning report concludes this way: "Put simply, the California teacher workforce faces a critical tension between expectations and resources."

Indeed.

So take it from me, don't be a teacher.

It's a shitty career.

The pay sucks.

The work environment sucks.

The benefits used to be good, but they're being cut.

Soon you can expect to be laid off at anytime for any reason.

Oprah hates you and talks shit about you on her show in between the segments on strippers.

President Obama wants to see you fired.

And Bill Gates thinks you're paid too much and should work on commission.

So please, do NOT go to school to become a teacher.

Yes, it's true, you're helping the future generation and you're helping hundreds of children a year.

But you're also sacrificing your own health, sanity and self-esteem.

Who needs to hear some monopolistic criminal like Bill Gates talk shit about them, given the crap he puts out at Microsoft?

Apparently teachers do.

Or at least Gates and the corporate media think they do.

So again I say, do NOT become a teacher.

The powers that be have decided any idiot can have 25 minutes of training from Wendy Kopp and be an "excellent teacher."

So go into some other field where they don't bash you on the front pages and the op-ed pages and from City Hall and the White House.

That's the message these days.

And prospective teachers in California are hearing it.

6 comments:

  1. This sounds about right..Who can blame Californians for not wanting to be teachers?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This post speaks to me a lot. I don't live in CA. But I felt what you stated. When I got laid-off from my corporate,white collar job last year, I decided I will do a "real" job - something which will provide services that people NEED (not what they WANT). I looked into becoming a inner city public school teacher and started reading various sources. I didn't grow up here in US and don't have children so didn't know much about public schools. But one thing I clearly knew was that urban schools suck compared to suburban schools - this from friends who all moved to suburbs as they were starting families. The more I read about creeping capitalism/corporatism in schools, the more I decided against teaching. I mean, I just came out a dumbed down corporate culture. So why will I go into another phony corproate culture that are the schools? At least in corporations, the pay/benefits were good in return for all the brainwashing/propaganda/dumbing down. And mind you, I am talking about a very very low bar here. So there goes my thought of becoming a teacher.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Check out this gem debunking the myth of Bill Gates as a business genius.
    http://lbo-news.com/2010/12/02/bill-gates-business-genius/

    While I was aware he is cut-throat monopoly capitalist squeezing out his competitors and peddles subprime products, I didn't realise he stole credit from Gary Kildall as the father of Personal Computers. I was also reading "Unjust Desserts" which referred to the book "they made America" which provides us the gory details of the sleaze that is Gates.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I teach in California... semi suburban/semi rural area, about 45 minutes south of San Francisco. I've been reading the many entertaining and informative New York City teacher blogs for quite some time now and wonder why anyone would want to teach in New York City, with your mayoral control and dystopian evaluation system.

    I figure, people love New York and are willing to put up with the BS. I think it's the same here. People want to live in California, especially the Bay Area, and are willing to put up with a lot of BS to do so. Of course the COLA is so high, teaching makes it really difficult to break even unless you have a higher-earning spouse.

    Still, I have strongly discouraged my own children from considering teaching, and they are listening to me. It's becoming unbearable with all the political weirdness. I never thought I'd wish to be 10 years older, but lately I have been!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Above all, don't go into this field as a "second career." You will be the first to be targeted illegally and thrown out the door. Once you are there, you will never work again as a teacher. These assholes who run the districts love the Barbie doll bimbos.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I have been wishing to be 10 years older too! My colleagues who have about five years to go before retirement - I figure they'll make it. But I have 18 or 19 years to go - that's too far out and I am sure that the system will have been done before then so that nobody will actually want to teach and even if you do, they will make it so that only the "Barbie dolls" susan speaks of are hired and kept (for a few years, at any rate.)

    ReplyDelete