Signaling a preference for a much smaller role for the federal government in public schooling, Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee, is introducing legislation on Thursday to revise No Child Left Behind, the Bush-era education law.Coming two days after Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa and chairman of the Senate education committee, released a 1,150-page education bill, the bill by Mr. Alexander, who is the ranking Republican on the committee, will compete with it.The Alexander bill is described in its introduction as restoring “freedom to parents, teachers, principals, governors and local communities so that they can improve their local public schools.”At less than one-fifth the length of Mr. Harkin’s bill, Mr. Alexander’s legislation would allow states to devise curriculum standards, tests, school rating systems and consequences for schools that fail to meet state goals with far fewer guidelines than are included in the Harkin bill.Both bills would amend the half-century-old Elementary and Secondary Education Act that governs public schools receiving federal money to support the most vulnerable students.“What they are really saying is they don’t trust parents and they don’t trust classroom teachers and states to care about and help educate their children, and they want someone in Washington do it for them,” Mr. Alexander said of Democrats in a telephone interview. “I just completely reject that.”...Mr. Alexander’s bill continues the current law’s requirement of testing students in reading and math in third through eighth grades and once in high school. All schools must report the scores and show how different racial groups, students with disabilities, those learning the English language and poor students perform on the tests.The bill would require states to set standards that would allow students to be ready for college or a job “without the need for remediation.”Neither Mr. Harkin’s nor Mr. Alexander’s bill mandates the content of academic standards. Mr. Alexander’s bill also does not prescribe what should be included in a state’s annual goals for student performance on tests; Mr. Harkin’s bill sets more guidelines.The Alexander bill encourages, but would not require, states to set up teacher evaluation systems. It also does not mandate any turnaround measures for schools that fail to meet state goals, although it does list options including closing a school, replacing the principal or offering higher pay to recruit new teachers.
The details on the Dem bill introduced by Harkin are here.
Republicans are still looking to kill off the system with vouchers (Alexander is adding that as an amendment to his bill), but there is less and less micromanaging from them these days.
The influence of the Tea Party and the libertarian wing has some positive effects
Don't trust anything that comes from a Tennessee legislature. That state already has one of the worst teacher evals, they also tooks away any rights of the union, so the union is now a powerless agent. Then they punished Nashville for voting against a charter by withholding needed public school funding, and now their is legislation that would overrule the school boards on charters. Many states are now appointing charter czars to make those decisions. Both sides have mainly the same bill, but once a state has complete control, just think what really will happen.....Both sides are setting public education up for failure.
ReplyDeleteYou're absolutely right about the Tennessee stuff. That said, if it's between the Harkin bill and the Alexander bill, I prefer the Alexander bill. We can fight the charter czars at the state and district level, as you note we often have to. But its really hard to fight at the nation level and it would be great if we could stop having to do that.
Delete