Thursday, August 1, 2013

What The Common Core/Danielson Rubric Has Been Devised To Produce

“The most deadly criticism one could make of modern civilization is that apart from its man-made crises and catastrophes, is not humanly interesting. . . . In the end, such a civilization can produce only a mass man: incapable of spontaneous, self-directed activities: at best patient, docile, disciplined to monotonous work to an almost pathetic degree. . . . Ultimately such a society produces only two groups of men: the conditioners and the conditioned, the active and passive barbarians.” —Lewis Mumford, 1951

This statement is taken from a larger piece on mental illness and the dehumanization of American society in Salon.

I couldn't help but think of the Common Core/Danielson juggernaut as I read this piece:

Underlying many of psychiatry’s nearly 400 diagnoses is the experience of helplessness, hopelessness, passivity, boredom, fear, isolation, and dehumanization—culminating in a loss of autonomy and community-connectedness. Do our societal institutions promote:
  • Enthusiasm—or passivity?
  • Respectful personal relationships—or manipulative impersonal ones?
  • Community, trust, and confidence—or isolation, fear and paranoia?
  • Empowerment—or helplessness?
  • Autonomy (self-direction)—or heteronomy (institutional-direction)?
  • Participatory democracy—or authoritarian hierarchies?
  • Diversity and stimulation—or homogeneity and boredom?

Gee, a standardized curriculum tied to regular standardized tests all the year through tied to standardized evaluations of teachers so that nobody deviates from the status quo curricula - that should address all these problems people are facing that are making them feel helpless, hopeless, passive, bored, fearful, isolated, and dehumanized.

Yeah, not so much actually.

But of course the intent of the Common Core and Danielson and education reform and charter schools has always been about beating the humanity and individuality out of people, sterilizing the education experience even more than it already is, and churning out good little workers disciplined enough to follow orders and compliant consumers hungry to fill their starving souls with material goods.

But the more the powers that be try and control people, the worse things become:

The reality is that with enough helplessness, hopelessness, passivity, boredom, fear, isolation, and dehumanization, we rebel and refuse to comply. Some of us rebel by becoming inattentive. Others become aggressive. In large numbers we eat, drink and gamble too much. Still others become addicted to drugs, illicit and prescription. Millions work slavishly at dissatisfying jobs, become depressed and passive aggressive, while no small number of us can’t cut it and become homeless and appear crazy. Feeling misunderstood and uncared about, millions of us ultimately rebel against societal demands, however, given our wherewithal, our rebellions are often passive and disorganized, and routinely futile and self-destructive.

And so, they drug us - sometimes literally, with Big Pharma's "wonder drugs" that actually make many conditions worse in the long run, or sometimes figuratively, with the lies and half-truths they feed us in the media and in school.

How many more passive barbarians will be mass produced through President Obama's Race to the Top education reform system?

How many more children will grow up to lose their sense of wonder, their idealism, their creativity, their very souls to an education system that values only what can be "quantified."

The Salon article notes the following:

How engaged are we with our schooling? Another Gallup poll “The School Cliff: Student Engagement Drops With Each School Year” (released in January 2013), reported that the longer students stay in school, the less engaged they become. The poll surveyed nearly 500,000 students in 37 states in 2012, and found nearly 80% of elementary students reported being engaged with school, but by high school, only 40% reported being engaged. As the pollsters point out, “If we were doing right by our students and our future, these numbers would be the absolute opposite. For each year a student progresses in school, they should be more engaged, not less.”

Our education system should be helping to develop creative, idealistic, soulful people full of wonder, people full of empathy who can interact with others and feel a part of a larger community.

Instead we churn out fearful, selfish drones, isolated from community, stunted in creativity, bored beyond reason.

Clearly our education system is doing something wrong - unless those are the kinds of people you want to churn out.

And of course that is exactly the kind of people the people who own us want to churn out - good little workers disciplined enough to follow orders and compliant consumers hungry to fill their starving souls with material goods.

No wonder non-compliance scares our owners so much.

Remember how they handled Occupy?

Nothing scares the men who own us more then a bunch of people getting together to talk about how badly they're getting screwed by the system.

No wonder they're spying on us.

No wonder they're taking away the commons.

No wonder they're paramilitarizing the police forces in every city.

Anything to prop up the status quo and make sure people stay isolated and fearful.

And now Charlotte Danielson and the Common Core are two more "tools" in their control toolbox.

It's all about forcing compliance and maintaining control.

So glad my union leaders at the AFT, the UFT and the NYSUT are on board with the latest control mechanisms.

Anything to prop up the status quo.

10 comments:

  1. So true. I've been looking over Danielson recently and it basically comes down to a checklist for teachers to follow and principals to check off.

    I wish principals and those "out of the classroom" UFT leadership people had to teach through this crap.

    It's a punishment and privatization tool, nothing more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a completely portable, fully self-contained, "hostile work environment"-in-a-box".

      It is designed... I've become convinced... to establish ( and then reproduce) a hostile work environment that falls just short of the legal definition of a " hostile work environment."

      Ms Danielson herself has ruminated publicly that school systems might encounter costly litigation in connection to their adoption of the rubric as an eval/harassment ( is there really any difference anymore? ) tool.

      Apparently the legal depts have decided it's worth the risk. What the hell; it's not THEIR money.

      Delete
    2. That's a great description, Paul - "a completely portable, fully self-contained, 'hostile work environment'-in-a-box".

      That really gets at the essence of what this is supposed to do.

      The animosity and hostility it creates between teachers and administrators - that's all part of the plan. Divide and conquer, divide and conquer. Make everybody miserable, suspicious, angry, frustrated and angry - not to mention overworked. And all to make the classroom a standardized experience for all.

      Ugh - going to be a rough year until the first lawsuits get filed.

      Delete
    3. It's a completely portable, fully self-contained, "hostile work environment-in-a-box".

      Its use as an observation rubric is designed... I've become convinced... to establish ( and then replicate) a hostile work environment that falls just short of the legal definition of a " hostile work environment."

      Ms Danielson herself has ruminated publicly that school systems might encounter costly litigation in connection to their adoption of the rubric as an eval/harassment ( is there really any difference anymore? ) tool.

      Apparently the legal depts have decided it's worth the risk. What the hell; it's not THEIR money.

      Delete
  2. The new standards aim to create robots to follow the corporate agenda at the expense of the community agenda. Close reading and text based questions geared to passing standardized tests do not foster creativity and intellectual development.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's exactly right - it kills me when I still see or hear teachers defend this stuff. It happens less now - many teachers no longer believe the Common Core/Danielson jive is meant to do anything other than churn the labor market. But it still occurs. Alas, experience should disabuse anybody of what these "assessment tools" are designed to do.

      Delete
  3. Great work here, very intelligently put together. It's a rainy one here in B-Lo but our Board managed to flip Lil John King the bird and go with the plan he threatens to de-fund for turnarounds. I also observed a stream of new names in the comments section of our local rag who are hip to King's backdoor appointment, lack of teaching cred and laughable attempts at leadership. I am far from a rosy optimist but the good guys connected with a few bricks yesterday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Glad to hear that, Sean! Buffalo seems to be the only place in the state giving as good as it gets from John King and his NYSED goons. Unfortunately for those of us in NYC, our union is on the same Danielson/Pearson payroll as King is, so no fight coming out of here. We need Buffalo and other places to lead the way to force Mulgrew and his UFT sell-outs to fight this corporate education agenda movement.

      Delete
  4. Glad to see the Mumford (a Stuy grad, btw) quote: if we want to look for American sources for the answers to our dilemmas, he's one of the best places to start

    In his masterpiece, "The Pentagon of Power," he analyzes the danger of centralized, technology-based remote control of social, economic and political systems, dominated by self serving elites compulsively seeking power and the hyper-rational pursuit of irrational aims.

    He said that unless there was an awakening of consciousness and action, then we are all doomed to what he called The Electronic Dark Ages.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How right Mumford was - we are living in The Electronic Dark Ages already.

      BTW, I didn't realize he was a Stuyvesant grad. I wonder how many Mumfords Stuyvesant will churn out in the Common Core era?

      Delete