Great news:
At least two of the three leading Democratic mayoral candidates are set
to nix plans for handing sensitive student data, including test scores
and discipline records, to private companies.
The move against the $100 million inBloom project — if former
Controller Bill Thompson or Public Advocate Bill de Blasio win in
November — could spell the end of the already faltering data-sharing
plan and set off a showdown with the state.
“Like any parent, I know that private student data should never be
bought and sold without explicit parental consent,” said de Blasio in a
statement. “As mayor, I will protect students’ privacy and stop this
needless invasion of privacy.”
Thompson spokesman John Collins, said, if elected, “Bill Thompson will make sure parents consent before personal information about their children is shared with a private company.”
Council Speaker Christine Quinn, the third leading Democrat for mayor,
has staked out a slightly more conciliatory position, expressing
“concern.”
InBloom, funded primarily by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation,
was originally conceived of as a joint project for multiple states. Of
the nine states that originally expressed interest, five have now backed
away.
The idea is to format student data — including attendance, test scores,
learning disabilities and disciplinary records — in a way that can be
used by educational tech companies to improve classroom instruction and
aid students in danger of failing.
The companies would not be allowed to sell students’ data, but
concerned parents fear the information could be compromised or stolen.
“Parents demand that their children’s personal information be pulled
out of inBloom and that we should have the right to decide which
companies have access to the information,” said Shino Tanikawa, a public
school parent with NYC Kids PAC, which has championed the privacy
issue.
It’s not clear whether New York state officials will allow future mayors to have a say.
The inBloom system is expected to be ready this fall, and state
officials don’t plan to allow parents or districts to opt out. They say
the information is required by law, most data have been submitted for
years, and inBloom is a required part of the federal Race to the Top
grants.
“In order to fulfill the Race to the Top commitments, we will be
providing a statewide data set ,” said Associate Commissioner Ken
Wagner, who noted the project aims to boost security standards for
districts around the state.
“We do have state-of-the-art protections built into this project.”
Notice the rhetorical horse hockey from the state - "state of the art protections" are built into the project.
What the hell does that mean?
The fact is, all of this data is going to be collected, tracked and handed over to private companies to use for commercial purposes by a "non-profit" run by a man whose former for-profit computer company helps the federal government spy on U.S. citizens.
If the state won't let parents or districts opt out, then parents and districts will sue them.
Having a mayor in City Hall who will fight to give parents the right to opt out of this system will go a long way toward killing it.
The more people who opt out, the more the beast gets starved of its data.
More than half of the state that were in it this thing are out already.
No comments:
Post a Comment