First a recap.
State of Politics linked to a Jessica Bakeman report at Capital NY on their Friday Extras round-up:
New York is one of two states not eligible for new “flexibility” policies announced by the federal government to help states transitioning to the Common Core standards.
The Bakeman article was behind the paywall at Capital NY, no other news outlet reported specifically on New York's lack of flex eligibility for teacher evaluations and if that news was buried in other media stories about the flexibility announcement, I didn't notice it.
I did note in the Friday post that it seemed odd Duncan would announce flexibility for all states, including New York, after his DOE threatened the state back in June if they de-linked APPR teacher evaluations from student test scores.
I tweeted Bakeman to see what the story was behind New York's lack of flex eligibility.
She responded:
@perdidostschool The flex is only available for states that have not yet begun testing based on the Common Core.
— Jessica Bakeman (@jessicabakeman) August 24, 2014
Under those rules, it would seem New York and Kentucky would not be eligible for flexibility on evaluations.
If I remember correctly, Kentucky was the first state to tie their state tests to Common Core, New York was the second.
More on this as I get it.
https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-flexibility/map/ny.html
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link. Duncan announced the new flexibility rules last week after both the initial flexibility request was approved by the USDOE (May 2012) and amended (July 31, 2014.) So it was possible that whatever was in the July 2014 amendment could have been superseded by Duncan's announcement, Alas, looks not to be so.
Delete