Do you remember the Willard Lanham/Project Cougar NYCDOE scandal from back in 2011?
If you don't, you can look up some posts I wrote about it
here,
here and
here.
The basic overview was a DOE tech consultant stole a bunch of money from the DOE with the help of IBM and Verizon, who helped him cover the trail.
The consultant, Willard "Ross" Lanham, stole $1.7 million from the DOE from 2002-2008 on top of the six figure salary the Bloomberg DOE was already paying him as a consultant.
The scandal got the tabloid treatment when it was discovered that Lanham had an estranged wife (who you can see below) still living in his house (which you can see above) he had built in his own little real estate development and running a "Cougar" dating service for herself out of it.
She billed herself as "yummy mommy" on her blog and lived the high life meeting 20-somethings in the Long Island club scene:
Lanham had even named the street where his house was after his wife, Laura.
It was a sweet story of crime, betrayal and fiscal ineptitude from Bloomberg and his minions.
News of the story came around the same time we were beginning to understand just how much got stolen in the CityTime scandal.
The $1.7 million Lanham stole with the help of IBM and Verizon was a pittance compared to the $600 million the CityTime crooks stole, but it still pointed to an underlying rot in the way Bloomberg and his government outsourced work, hired consultants and did little-to-no oversight on the projects.
Now we learn via a Scott Stringer report that the city is STILL paying the piper for the Lanham scandal, two years after Lanham went to jail and almost a year after "fiscal genius" Bloomberg flew off to Bermuda:
New
York City has been missing out on tens of millions of dollars a year in
technology funding for schools from the federal government because of a
continuing investigation into the
Education Department, the city comptroller said this week.
...
The money comes from a program called
E-Rate.
It charges an average fee of about 25 cents per month to landline and
cellphone bills and then uses that money for services like broadband
technology in schools and libraries, according to the
Federal Communications Commission, which oversees the program.
Since
1998, the city has pulled in more than $3 billion in E-Rate financing,
the comptroller said, and while New Yorkers have continued to pay into
that system, they have been barred from the receiving end since 2011
because of a federal investigation.
The
F.C.C. declined to confirm or deny any investigation, but a city
official said the inquiry was prompted by a scandal involving
Willard Lanham, a former technology consultant for the city. He was accused of stealing money from the
Education Department
and using it to satisfy his and his wife’s expensive tastes, including
for cars like a Corvette and a Porsche and to finance the construction
of luxury homes on Long Island.
Mr. Lanham
was sentenced
to 37 months in prison in 2012 for stealing $1.7 million that was
supposed to pay for Internet access at the city’s public schools.
In
the letter, Mr. Stringer requested an update on the proceedings and
asked when the city would be reinstated to the program. The comptroller
said that while the Education Department had retained experts in E-Rate
compliance as consultants, and paid them more than $670,000, “apparently
those contracts ended without resolution to the city’s E-Rate problem.”
A
spokesman for the department said that applications had already been
submitted for the current E-Rate funding year, and that the program’s
administrators were reviewing that application as well as those from the
previous three years.
Last
week, the F.C.C. chairman, Tom Wheeler, proposed raising the annual
spending cap on the E-Rate program, which has not changed substantially
since it began in 1997, to $3.9 billion, in an effort to increase
Internet connectivity in schools. The F.C.C. said the increase would
cost consumers a few cents more per line each month.
Mr.
Stringer said this potential increase in spending could mean the city
would miss out on more than $350 million by the 2018 fiscal year. He
said he did not know if the city would eventually receive the E-Rate
money at the end of the investigation.
I've said this before, I'll say it again today:
Why does Bloomberg still have the reputation for being a fiscal genius and responsible manager of the city?
When you add up the consultant scandals and tech boondoggery during the Bloomberg Years, you see that billions were either stolen or wasted.
And as you can see from the Stringer report, the city
STILL continues to pay for Bloomberg's criminal malfeasance.
Let's imagine this was de Blasio screwing all this stuff up for years and years.
Can you imagine the treatment it would receive in the papers?
And yet, we see time and time again these stories of consultant criminality and tech boondoggery during the Bloomberg Years get reported with nary a negative word about our former billionaire mayor.
Reminds me a little of this, without the guillotine part at the end: