Perdido 03

Perdido 03
Showing posts with label Tom DiNapoli. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom DiNapoli. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

Let's Apply Andrew Cuomo's Teacher Evaluation System To His Start-Up NY Campaign And Other Promotional Programs


DiNapoli's audit of Cuomo's promotional ad campaign for New York found no "tangible results" for either generating job creation or business for the state.

Governor Cuomo is adamant that public schools in this state are failing and teachers need to be held accountable via his APPR teacher evaluation system that will "objectively" and "scientifically" measure each teacher's value and worth and sort us all out on a bell curve where some will be feted with bonuses and others will be slated for firing.

Meanwhile Cuomo spends $211 million on the state's promotional campaign including Start Up NY, Taste NY and I Love NY, and has no serious system to measure how well the programs are doing:

New York spent $211 million on an advertising contract to promote economic development and tourism in New York, including the Start-Up NY program, but produced "no tangible results," a state audit Monday said.

The Empire State Development Corporation spent the money on an advertising firm from December 2011 to November 2014, but the agency was not "able to effectively quantify and assess tangible outcomes from the initiatives," Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said in the audit.

"If you're spending over $200 million on advertising, it would seem to me that they would have more metrics or ways to quantify what is the return on those dollars that are spent," DiNapoli said in an interview with Gannett's Albany Bureau.

What little we do know about Cuomo's Start Up NY campaign shows it isn't effective:

Gannett reported last month that the Start-Up NY promotional campaign had cost taxpayers $53 million since the program's inception, while it had led to $1.7 million in private investment so far and just 76 jobs.

Imagine Cuomo's Start Up NY campaign was an educational program in the New York State school system.

What would Cuomo say about these numbers?

Spending $53 million to recoup $1.7 million in investment and 76 new jobs created.

Seems highly ineffective to me.

You can bet Cuomo would see it that way too if Start Up NY were an education program instead of a PR campaign for himself.

Shouldn't we apply Cuomo's own APPR evaluation system to his Start-Up NY campaign and other promotional campaigns like Taste NY and I Love NY?

I mean, so long as we're all about being "objective" and "scientific" in measuring schools, shouldn't we be "objective" and "scientific" in measuring Cuomo's programs too?

Monday, April 14, 2014

Cuomo Faces A Challenge Like He's Never Faced Before

Blake Zeff at Capital NY:

This time, Andrew Cuomo may be in some trouble.

I don’t write those words lightly: I’ve never written them before, and I’ve never even thought them.
But the man who’s picked fights with—and systematically disemboweled—every New York politician who’s stood in his way (or who he’s feared might stand in his way at some point) is up against a very different kind of obstacle this time.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara has not only taken possession of the files from the  corruption-fighting Moreland Commission that Cuomo recently closed down as part of a budget deal, but has also publicly floated the possibility of investigating the governor’s alleged meddling in its investigations.

What’s more, Bharara has publicly, humiliatingly suggested that Cuomo’s focus on cleaning up Albany was nothing more than a ploy to gain political leverage in budget negotiations.

This is a far more vexing and dangerous political threat than the governor faced in the likes of other rivals, like Comptroller Tom Dinapoli, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and Mayor Bill de Blasio, each of whom he has bullied and belittled without much trouble.

The unique problem posed by Bharara is that few of the tools Cuomo typically uses to beat back problems (and opponents) will be at his disposal when it comes to dealing with the federal prosecutor.

And what were the tools Cuomo used against the Big Three?

Zeff points out how Cuomo "investigated" DiNapoli when Cuomo was attorney general, a la Chris Christie, never indicting him over any crime but publicly besmirching his reputation and making him look like a criminal in the process.

He notes how he refused to endorse Schneiderman until long after it didn't matter, then subsumed some of the attorney general's power into his own once Scheiderman took office.

And de Blasio - well, you know what he did to de Blasio.

But Zeff says Cuomo doesn't have these same opportunities to humiliate Bharara:

The point is that Cuomo will not be able to do to a federal prosecutor what he did to these three.

Sure, he can seek to discredit Bharara anonymously (he’d be a fool to openly antagonize someone potentially investigating his office). And he could obliquely signal some species of threat, transmitting via one of the administration's go-to journalists some revelation about what Cuomo might be planning next.

But in the case of Bharara, when it is “reported” that people familiar with the governor’s thinking hear that he is contemplating some kind of countermove, it will lack some its usual menacing force.
That’s because Cuomo is entering this conflict without his usual leverage, against someone he can’t control, embarrass or investigate. Someone who also has subpoena power, and a potential interest in Cuomo’s staff’s communications. (Recall, the governor is famously protective of his office’s communiques, and rumored to use instantly evaporating Blackberry PIN messages instead of emails, the better to avoid a trail.)

The fact that the prosecutor in question is Bharara will make things that much more difficult.

I knew Bharara a bit when we briefly overlapped in Chuck Schumer’s Senate office on Capitol Hill around a decade ago. You don’t survive a multi-year tenure in that office without absorbing lessons in political power and communications. A quick wit and serious legal mind, he isn’t just a remote, lawyerly figure who happens to be a good prosecutor. Bharara, like Cuomo, knows how to operate in a political context.

They battled over turf when Cuomo was attorney general and both sought to police crime in common jurisdictions. (By all accounts, it was not an overly friendly cohabitation, with competition erupting over matters involving press releases.) Neither man backed down.

Zeff says despite all of this, Cuomo may skate like nothing happened, that what Bharara is planning to investigate does not necessarily constitute legal trouble for Sheriff Andy, but says this could be the outcome:

There’s also this: What if Bharara does to Cuomo what Cuomo did to Dinapoli? Until the U.S. attorney explicitly says that the governor is not under investigation, Cuomo could have a cloud over him that his Republican opponent Rob Astorino will be sure to exploit.

The New York City tabloids, so often partners to Cuomo in his never-quite-explicit personal crusades against other New York officials, have taken Bharara’s side in the battle, joining the Times in cheering him on and swatting at the governor. It’s the last thing Cuomo needs, for reasons beyond the obvious. Yes, it’s deeply unflattering on its own, but also it threatens his veneer of unquestionable invincibility—the very thing that keeps the rest of the state’s political firmament from criticizing him.

And that's exactly right - Bharara's move to take over Moreland and publicly chastise Cuomo over shutting the commission down before it had completed its work and refusing to rule out investigating the governor himself pricks the vneer of invincibility around Sheriff Andy and that's a very dangerous thing for Cuomo.

Just as fellow political bully and pal Chris Christie is a wounded animal in the water with the sharks all around him in New Jersey now that the Bridgegate scandal pricked the veneer of invincibility around him, Cuomo could end up with lots of enemies coming out of the woodwork to feed if Bharara draws any blood on him in this matter.

Monday, April 7, 2014

DiNapoli Opts Out Of Cuomo-Devised Trap

According to Capital Confidential, Comptroller DiNapoli released a statement explaining why he is opting out of the public campaign financing that Governor Cuomo and the legislature devised only for the comptroller's race:

The Comptroller has pushed for his office to lead the way as a statewide test for public financing of campaigns since just after he took office in 2007, and the Assembly passed his plan in 2011. But he argues that numerous aspects of the 2014 structure — oversight by the much-maligned state Board of Elections, its use of the pool of unclaimed funds controlled by the Comptroller’s office, and the fact that the change is coming at this point in the four-year election cycle — make it easy for his to reject taking part. Numerous good-government groups have told him to stay away rather than risk legitimizing a bad outcome. 
DiNapoli’s statement, which was released through his campaign committee:
“The pilot program for public financing of the Comptroller election is a poor excuse to avoid the real reforms New Yorkers deserve. At this point, I cannot participate in this pilot. I was always willing to have reform start with the Comptroller’s office, but I will not be a convenient sacrificial lamb. I hope that before the legislative session ends, there will be comprehensive campaign finance reform, as well as a reconsideration of the proposal I advanced, with realistic timeframes for successful implementation.”

Good government groups are backing DiNapoli on this, saying it's better for the comptroller to bow out rather than let a bad outcome ruin any future momentum for public financing of campaigns.

The Cuomo administration is attacking DiNapoli over the move, however:
"We are surprised that the Comptroller is opting out, as this was the Comptroller’s bill to begin with. If he has specific concerns, we will modify the proposal, unless, of course, he just doesn’t want to do public financing,” said Matt Wing.

If Cuomo is so upbeat on the proposal, he should modify the experiment to include his own race for re-election this year.

Sure it's the middle of an election cycle and sure Cuomo would have to give up his vast campaign warchest and sure the Board of Elections will probably make a mess of this the first time out - but hey, so what?

This is about "good government", right?

And who isn't more closely associated with "good government" than Sheriff Andy Cuomo?

Good for DiNapoli opting out.

If Cuomo gets shrill over it, DiNapoli can invite Sheriff Andy to "experiment" mid-cycle with a similar proposal for his own race.