Perdido 03

Perdido 03
Showing posts with label Dan Squadron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dan Squadron. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 2, 2013

Times, Post, and DN Newspaper Endorsements - NYers Didn't Care About Them

Blake Zeff:

Politicians thought voters cared what the top papers thought. That may not be the case any longer.
In New York, the city’s three largest papers – which each happen to also be among the nation’s top ten in circulation – suffered huge collective whiffs in recent weeks. For the office of mayor, the entire trifecta of the New York Times, Daily News, and Post, all endorsed Christine Quinn in the Democratic primary over Bill de Blasio. This was notable because the papers rarely agree on much (though all supported Michael Bloomberg). And the editorial consensus was viewed as a significant, possible turning point in the campaign for Quinn.

In reality, of course, the papers’ candidate was trounced, failing to make it into a runoff and trailing the winning primary candidate, Bill de Blasio, by nearly 25 points. One could argue that the margin might have been larger without their endorsements, which is hard to disprove. But polls at the time the papers weighed in showed Quinn with a fighter’s chance at squeezing into the primary. It just didn’t happen.

Fortunately for the editorial boards, there would be a second chance just weeks later. The primary for Public Advocate, the second-ranking office in the city, resulted in a runoff, leaving two candidates: Daniel Squadron and Letitia James.

As they did in the mayoral primary, all three papers of seemingly disparate ideological bents – The Times is generally seen as liberal, the Post conservative, and the News somewhere in between – went for Squadron. And last night when the runoff results came in, their chosen candidate…  was defeated by twenty points.

The next time the newspapers look to mock the UFT for their poor endorsement record - well, the newspapers aren't doing so hot lately either.

Few people want to listen to the Voice of God on the editorial page anymore.

Thank God.

A Very Solid Win For Tish James Over Dan Squadron Last Night

Turnout was pretty good for a runoff election with nothing else at stake.

Tish James got over 111,000 votes.

Some pundits were saying turnout was going to be about 100,000 overall for the runoff.

It was closer to 187,000

And James won by 36,000 votes.

A very solid win for James and a stinging defeat for Dan Squadron.

Given what a scummy campaign he ran, it couldn't have happened to a more deserving guy.

James gave an emotional speech last night after her victory:

James was briefly overcome with emotion as she thanked the boisterous crowd.

Today you elected me the first..." she paused, struggling for composure before continuing, "...The first woman of color to hold citywide office."

Fans broke into cheers as she told them, "I am so proud of what we accomplished together, and yes, I'm proud we made history tonight."

James then launched into a fiery speech about addressing troubled schools, the NYPD’s stop and frisk tactics and an affordable housing crunch -- and railed against the “right-wing Republican” forces President Obama is fighting in Washington over health care.

It was very good to see her win this race.

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

87% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 60%, Dan Squadron 40% - 10:05 PM

So much for those robocalls, Danny boy...

83% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 59.5%, Dan Squadron 40.5% - 10:02 PM

First black woman to hold city wide office - Tish James.

Very, very exciting.

79% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 59.5%, Dan Squadron 40.5% - 9:58 PM

Squadron getting his ass kicked.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving guy.

74% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 59%, Dan Squadron 41% - 9:56 PM

Tish James is going to be our next public advocate.

Buh-bye, Dan.

68% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 58%, Dan Squadron 42% - 9:53 PM

Only a matter of time now.

59% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 58%, Dan Squadron 42% - 9:51 PM

This is going to get called soon.

50% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 58%, Dan Squadron 42% - 9:49 PM

Starting to look very good for James.

41% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 57%, Dan Squadron 42% - 9:44 PM

And so now it's starting to look very clear why Squadron went negative with all the anonymous calls and mailers.

32% Of The Vote Counted: Tish James 56%, Dan Squadron 44% - 9:39 PM

Starting to look bad for Robocall Dan.

Did Dan Squadron Go With The Anonymous Negative Ads Because He Knew He Was Losing?

He sent out a ton of anonymous negative robocalls and anonymous negative mailers.

Wouldn't own up to it last night on NY1 but did admit to it on Twitter today.

Just as Cory Booker launching a negative ad this late in the campaign suggests Booker is facing some turbulence, Squadron's relentless negative barrage - most of it done anonymously - suggests his campaign knew it was losing.

We'll see soon enough.

James has the early lead.


More Sleaze From Dan Squadron

Dan Squadron is desperate to win this Public Advocate runoff, that is clear.

Not only has he been running anonymous robcall attack ads (which he refused to own up to on NY 1 last night), but he's also sending out anonymous attack mailers.

It's a shame Squadron is too gutless to take ownership of his attacks against his opponent.

If you haven't voted for Tish James yet today, go out and do so - the polls are open until 9 PM.

It's the right thing to do.

Don't Forget To Vote For Tish James For Public Advocate Today

The polls are open from 6 AM to 9 PM.

Turnout is expected to be very, very low.

John Liu said the following:

Councilwoman Leticia James has spent her entire career fighting for working people both in Albany and in the City Council. She’s stood up against stop and frisk, supported laws that increased wages for working people, and fought against the closing of day care centers in our communities. She has the skills and the passion to take help New Yorkers and be their voice at City Hall as Public Advocate. That's why she has my endorsement as well as the endorsement of the Working Families Party (WFP), members of the Black Latino and Asian Caucus of the City Council, NOW NYC, the Tenants Pac, 32BJ and countless unions and Progressive groups.

We need your help making history and electing the first woman of color to citywide office. Please vote on October 1st for Leticia James for Public Advocate.

Vote Tish James today.

Send her opponent, sleazy Dan Squadron, back to the rock he crawled out from under.

Sleazy Dan Squadron Refuses To Take Responsibility For His Campaign's Anonymous RoboCall Attack Against Tish James

Dan Squadron is a sleazeball.

It's one thing to attack your opponent and take responsibility for the attacks.

Alas, Squadron doesn't have the courage or the moral core to do that - as Politicker reports here:

Sunday, September 29, 2013

This Comment Crystallizes Why You Should Vote Against Dan Squadron

Someone left this comment on the Daily News endorsement of Dan Squadron for public advocate:

How can the Daily News, once the paper of the working man, endorse an anti-labor candidate who is in bed with Bloomberg's developer cronies and charter school hedge fund investors and charlatans?
As I wrote earlier,

If The Daily News Likes A Candidate, You Know He Must Be Bad

The DN editors endorsed Dan Squadron for public advocate today:

Since 2009, Squadron has ably represented lower Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn, including Greenpoint and Carroll Gardens, in the state Senate. He brought intelligence, diligence and rationality to the post with a strong bent toward problem-solving on behalf of his constituents — exactly the qualities needed in a public advocate.

As a prime example, Squadron was instrumental in shepherding Brooklyn Bridge Park through a contentious struggle from the drawing board into reality — where it now serves thousands upon thousands of New Yorkers.

Bearing solid liberal Democratic credentials, Squadron has also shown the independence to break with orthodoxy in favor of common sense. He did so in fighting to expand access to charter schools statewide, a position that placed him at odds with the United Federation of Teachers.

Then, too, Squadron was the only one of the five original Democratic contenders who had the courage to buck the municipal unions by questioning the taxpayers’ ability to finance retroactive raises for the municipal workforce. Although the tab for those could run to a bankrupting $7.8 billion, the others in the field played to the unions with notions that the city should just pay up.

Squadron is a DFER crony and reliable vote against unions and for the corporate interests and

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Wall Street Democrat Reshma Saujani Can't Scrub Away Her Wall Street Past

Reshma Suajani, a former hedge fund lawyer and DFER-backed candidate for Congress (Carolyn Maloney beat her handily a few years back in a primary), wants you to think she's progressive Democrat.

She used to hawk around her hedge fund connections and talk about how important Wall Street was to the health of the city, but that was before she decided running for public advocate was her next career move.

Now she wants you to forget she has connections to the hedge fund crooks on Wall Street and believe that she's a progressive Democrat out to protect the people while her opponents are tainted by their connections to wealth, power, privilege and the status quo.

As such, she launched an attack against one of her opponents in the race, Dan Squadron, calling him "Trust Fund Dan" because he was born into a wealthy family and inherited a trust fund from his father.

So far so good, right - Saujani's framing her opponent as a child of privilege who is tainted by his wealth while trying to get voters to overlook her Wall Street past.

But that's where the story gets complicated:

In what had been a low-key race for New York City public advocate, Reshma Saujani's campaign has begun to attack her rival, Brooklyn state Sen. Daniel Squadron, by calling him "Trust Fund Dan," to imply that he has been the beneficiary of money earned by his late father, Howard Squadron, a prominent media attorney whose clients included Rupert Murdoch.

In fact, the story of that money had a very sad ending, according to Mr. Squadron, 33, who said it was lost in 2008 in Bernie Madoff's infamous Ponzi scheme.

In the 1980s, the elder Squadron and his wife, Anne, became one of Mr. Madoff's early investors, and were friends with the now-disgraced fraudster.

When Mr. Squadron was 22, his father died, leaving a savings account for Mr. Squadron and 18 other family members, including Anne and his four older siblings. In December 2008, according to Mr. Squadron, that savings vanished: It had been invested with Mr. Madoff, whose Ponzi scheme financially devastated a number of families and nonprofits, especially in New York's Jewish community.

"Like so many others, my family and I were victims of Madoff. I—and all of us—lost virtually everything that my late father had left for us," Mr. Squadron wrote in a statement to The Insider.
Indeed, a 2009 article in Forbes recounts how Mr. Squadron's mother, Anne, had to sell her Manhattan apartment after Mr. Madoff's Ponzi scheme collapsed. She was also sued by fellow family members because the account was worthless.

Mr. Squadron, who grew up in Riverdale, an upscale Bronx neighborhood, has had advantages in life, including a Yale education. His grandfather had immigrated via Ellis Island, and his father grew up in the Bronx and went to the elite Bronx High School of Science and the once-prestigious City College before making a small fortune in the legal field.

Informed of Mr. Squadron's Madoff story, Ms. Saujani's campaign doubled down, saying that Mr. Squadron was simply "whining" and that a lawsuit shows that Mr. Squadron's family made more through Mr. Madoff than it lost. Her campaign noted that Mr. Squadron and the 18 relatives are named in a complex "clawback" lawsuit filed by a Madoff bankruptcy trustee, who has launched some 1,000 similar cases. The suit states that the Squadron family invested $10.8 million in Mr. Madoff's fund and received $11.8 million in "fictitious profits," and that some of that money should go to Madoff victims who suffered a net loss. Mr. Squadron and his family, who have not been accused of any wrongdoing, differ with the trustee's accounting.

The trustee's case has not been resolved, but Ms. Saujani's campaign took issue with Mr. Squadron's tale of woe.

"Trust Fund Dan is not a victim of Bernie Madoff, but a beneficiary," a said Saujani spokesman. "Irving Picard, the trustee for the real victims, has rejected Squadron's poverty routine as totally bogus. The money he claims to have lost is chump change compared to the millions in fictitious profits he made before the scam was exposed."

"Now Trust Fund Dan is whining and fighting in court to avoid paying the true victims of the Ponzi scheme. Only someone from incredible privilege whose Dad was close personal friends with Bernie Madoff would have the audacity to plead poverty after making millions off so many ruined lives," he continued.

The attacks from Ms. Saujani's campaign may be designed, in part, to blunt any attacks against her own history working as a hedge fund lawyer on Wall Street. Ms. Saujani touted that history in her 2010 run for Congress against Upper East Side Rep. Carolyn Maloney, but this year is seeking to position herself as a progressive. Mr. Squadron's campaign said that her campaign's statements were insensitive.

"Ms. Saujani has a long history of misleading and mean-spirited personal attacks against progressive Democrats who get results, so we're unsurprised by her campaign's latest outburst," a Squadron spokeswoman fired back in a statement. "Attacking a candidate's deceased father is, for Ms. Saujani, as predictable as it is inappropriate. Our campaign won't stoop to her level. Ms. Saujani should practice what she preaches, release her household's tax returns, and stop the mudslinging." (Ms. Saujani has released some of her own tax returns but not any of her husband's.)

Brooklyn Councilwoman Letitia James and Staten Island's Cathy Guerriero are also in the race for the Democratic nomination, which is tantamount to victory in the November general election.

Leaving aside the efficacy of the Saujani campaign's attacks on Squadron, let's take a look at the hypocrisy they're engaging in by launching these attacks.

Alex Pareene reported on the Saujani campaign back in April on Salon and noted how she conveniently forgot to mention her career on Wall Street working for some very scummy firms:

Oddly, her campaign biography doesn’t mention anything about Saujani’s career, which, before she began running for things, was spent working for Wall Street. Tom Robbins got Saujani to give up her closely guarded résumé in 2010. Saujani has worked at one prestigious law firm and three hedge funds. At the law firm, Davis Polk & Wardwell, Saujani defended securities fraud cases. She worked for two years as an affiliate of the Carlyle Group, Carlyle-Blue Wave Partners Management, that invested in mortgage-backed securities. Then she went to Fortress Investment, a fund that “was revealed to own a subprime mortgage lender that foreclosed on New Orleans homeowners who fell behind on their payments after Hurricane Katrina.”

Saujani's campaign vanity edited Hedge Fundie Reshma's Wikipedia page to remove any evidence of her working on Wall Street and even removed how badly she lost to Carolyn Maloney in the 2010 primary she waged against the Congresswoman (81%-19%).

But all that information is back and, helpful person that I am, let me put it here for you:

Saujani worked at the law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell, where she defended securities fraud cases,[9] and on a pro bono basis handled asylum cases.[10] In 2005, she joined the investment firm Carret Asset Management.[10] After Saujani left Carret, its principal owner, financier Hassan Nemazee, was convicted on felony charges relating to bank fraud carried out over the course of several years at Carret, including during Saujani's time at Carret; she later told the news media that she had had no knowledge of any illicit conduct at Carret.[10][11] Subsequently, she joined Blue Wave Partners Management, a subsidiary of the Carlyle Group, the global alternative asset management firm specializing in private equity with a wide variety of investments ranging from defense contractors to nursing homes. She was an associate general counsel at Blue Wave, which invested in mortgage-backed securities; it was closed in the aftermath of the 2008 market collapse.[9] Immediately prior to running for Congress, Saujani was a deputy general counsel at Fortress Investment Group,[12] which had previously gained notoriety after it was reported that Fortress had invested some of its assets in subprime mortgage lenders who had foreclosed on the homes of Hurricane Katrina victims in the Gulf Coast.[13]

Her Wikipedia page also notes the vanity editing her campaign did of her Wikipedia entry:

In January 2013, Saujani's Wikipedia page was heavily edited to remove traces of Saujani working for Wall Street firms such as hedge funds. Her campaign admitted to this,[28] arguing they did it because they disagreed with the stated facts.[29]

So here we have Wall Street Democrat Reshma Saujani, once supported by the hedge fundies at the Democrats for Education Reform, once proudly running for Congress as the candidate who was “running on my Wall Street record, not from it," now attacking Dan Squadron as the Wall Street crook.

That takes some chutzpah, doesn't it?

Well, we'll just have to make sure that Hedge Fundie Reshma's proud Wall Street past isn't forgotten as she runs away from her record and tries to fool people into thinking she's something she isn't - namely a progressive Democrat who will look out for the little guy.

Reshma Saujani is one of the more despicable people in politics in this city.

Her attacks on Squadron as a Wall Street crook tied to Madoff while Saujani herself worked for Wall Street firms that helped bring about the 2008 collapse and foreclosed on Hurricane Katrina victims is just the latest example of that.

No matter how many times her campaign tries to scrub her Wikipedia page, they won't be able to scrub the taint off Reshma Saujani herself.