Governor Cuomo yesterday:
"The teachers’ union represents the teachers. I understand that. … I
represent the students and I want to do the best we can for the students
and for their education," he said. "One of the issues we have to work
through where the teachers’ union doesn’t agree with me is, I want to
evaluate teachers, and I want to be able to get bad teachers out of the
classroom.
“I understand the union’s issue; they don’t want anyone
fired,” Cuomo said. “But we have teachers that have been found guilty
of sexually abusing students who we can’t get out of the classroom. We
have a process where literally it takes years and years to get a bad
teacher out of the classroom. And I understand the teachers’ rights, but
I also understand the students’ rights. And the Albany government, the
Albany media, is very responsive to the teachers’ union and their
groups. I get it. But the students have rights, too. And this whole
education system is about the students.”
See what's he's doing there?
Mary Ahern did:
So did Arthur Goldstein:
So did Nick Bianculli:
Cuomo's fear mongerig is straight out of the Michelle Rhee/Campbell Brown education reformer playbook.
Whenever they want to try and turn the public against teachers, they trot out the "Perv Teacher" fear card and play it liberally - even when the whole thing is made up.
Michelle Rhee, for example, fired 266 teachers in Washington D.C. when she was schools chancellor, claiming that they were sexual and physical abusers of children.
She was lying, er, "misspeaking":
Michelle A. Rhee, the chancellor of District of Columbia schools, finds herself at the center of a controversy again, this time over comments attributed to her in a business magazine saying that some teachers who were laid off last fall had sexually and physically abused students.
Rhee laid off 266 teachers and a few dozen administrators in October
in an effort to close a budget gap, a move that led to student protests,
a lawsuit by the local teachers' union, and a contentious face-off with
the local city council. Rhee was accused by her detractors of using
the budget as an excuse to lay off veteran teachers without having to
work with seniority rules.
But her response defending her actions to Fast Company startled many.
"I got rid of teachers who had hit children, who had had sex with children, who had missed 78 days of school," Rhee told Fast Company. "Why wouldn't we take those things into consideration?"
Rhee's comments, first circulated over the weekend in D.C-area media, sent shockwaves around the region and beyond, invoking the ire
of many teachers and some of Rhee's sharpest critics, including the
local teachers' union president and the city council chairman.
"With a callous, nonspecific statement that names no one and thus
blames all, Michelle Rhee has called into question the ethics of 266 men
and women, and she's done it in a way that gives these individuals
almost no recourse to defend themselves," George Parker, president of
the Washington Teachers Union, wrote in a letter to D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, who is Rhee's boss. Parker asked Rhee to apologize to teachers in his letter.
Questions immediately arose. If these teachers had been physically
and sexually abusing children, why were they allowed to remain until a
budget crunch required dismissing teachers? How many of the 266
teachers had been abusing students?
As the Washington City Paper explains, Rhee and other school officials are required by law to immediately report any suspected abuse of children they are aware of.
I asked Rhee on Monday to shed light on the context in which she made
her comments and if she had moved to take any legal or disciplinary
action against those teachers who had allegedly abused students before
the October layoffs. Answers to me—and the legions of other people
wanting an answer—were slow in coming.
After nearly five days of silence on the matter, Rhee responded to us all a short time ago via a two-page letter she wrote to the council chairman and two other members about their numerous concerns.
The chancellor said her comment to Fast Company was made
"some time ago" while explaining that teacher performance and not just
seniority was an important factor considered in deciding who to
terminate during the layoffs caused by a budget cut.
"I was describing the kind of conduct that was appropriate to take
into account in implementing the reduction in force," she wrote. "The
examples I gave involved a very small minority of the teachers who were
terminated in the budget reduction."
How small a minority? Rhee says one teacher had "serious allegations
of sexual misconduct," and that teacher had been removed from the school
immediately. The case was referred to police, and the teacher was not
in the classroom during the time of the layoffs, she said.
Six employees who were laid-off had been previously suspended for
using corporal punishment on students. Two employees had served
suspensions for "being AWOL on multiple occasions and several other
employees had egregious time and attendance records." In the case of
these actions, the discipline procedures embedded in union contracts
prescribed suspension, rather than firing for those offenses.
Have you got those numbers now?
One teacher accused of sexual misconduct, already taken out of the classroom.
Six teachers with previous suspensions for "corporal punishment."
Two with previous suspensions for being AWOL.
But she said this:
"I got rid of teachers who had hit children, who had had sex with children, who had missed 78 days of school," Rhee told Fast Company. "Why wouldn't we take those things into consideration?"
Nonetheless Rhee felt no compunction to apologize to the vast majority of teachers who weren't accused of having "sex with children" or hitting children.
Ironically Rhee is married to a man who
has been accused of multiple events of sexual misconduct and was alleged by a US Inspector General to
have helped him cover up some of those allegations, but that's a story for another time.
The point here is, whenever reformers want to drive up public outrage against teachers, they play the "Perv Teacher" fear card and conflate the issue with whatever other issues they want.
As Mary Ahern noted in her tweet, Cuomo's conflating sexual misconduct
(which no one I know defends - certainly not the UFT, as Mike Mulgrew's response to Campbell Brown shows) with evaluation of so-called teacher effectiveness.
That Cuomo feels the need to conflate the two and play the "Perv Teacher" fear card shows you how little confidence he has in his argument that the public education system needs to be broken.
It also shows you how scummy Cuomo is.
Like Rhee, he has no problem smearing teachers as criminals in order to get them off the payroll.
