Just wondering.
You know, the NY Post didn't want to publish that story until they realized there was a sex angle with the divorce and the "cougar" wife/hooker.
Would have loved to see the editorial argument in Murdochland:
"No, we can't cover a story about another outside consultant stealing millions from the city!"
"Yes, but there's a hooker/wife with topless photos and an escort service website where she trolls for younger sugar daddies to take care of her! We HAVE to cover that! We can run the photos!!!!"
Oh, the sacrifices that have to be made at the Murdoch Street Post in order to bring enough sex and sleaze to the readership.
No comments:
Post a Comment