Perdido 03

Perdido 03

Thursday, May 14, 2015

If Only These Banks Were Teachers

From the NY Times:
For most people, pleading guilty to a felony means they will very likely land in prison, lose their job and forfeit their right to vote.

But when five of the world’s biggest banks plead guilty to an array of antitrust and fraud charges as soon as next week, life will go on, probably without much of a hiccup.

The Justice Department is preparing to announce that Barclays, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup and the Royal Bank of Scotland will collectively pay several billion dollars and plead guilty to criminal antitrust violations for rigging the price of foreign currencies, according to people briefed on the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Most if not all of the pleas are expected to come from the banks’ holding companies, the people said — a first for Wall Street giants that until now have had only subsidiaries or their biggest banking units plead guilty.


The guilty pleas, scarlet letters affixed to banks of this size and significance, represent another prosecutorial milestone in a broader effort to crack down on financial misdeeds. Yet as much as prosecutors want to punish banks for misdeeds, they are also mindful that too harsh a penalty could imperil banks that are at the heart of the global economy, a balancing act that could produce pleas that are more symbolic than sweeping.

Holding companies, while appearing to be the most important entities at the banks, are in less jeopardy of suffering the consequences of guilty pleas. Some banks worried that a guilty plea by their biggest banking units, which hold licenses that enable them to operate branches and make loans, would be riskier, two of the people briefed on the matter said. The fear, they said, centered on whether state or federal regulators might revoke those licenses in response to the pleas.
Behind the scenes in Washington, the banks’ lawyers are also seeking assurances from federal regulators — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Labor Department — that the banks will not be barred from certain business practices after the guilty pleas, the people said. While the S.E.C.’s five commissioners have not yet voted on the requests for waivers, which would allow the banks to conduct business as usual despite being felons, the people briefed on the matter expected a majority of commissioners to grant them.

In reality, those accommodations render the plea deals, at least in part, an exercise in stagecraft. And while banks might prefer a deferred-prosecution agreement that suspends charges in exchange for fines and other concessions — or a nonprosecution deal like the one that UBS is on the verge of losing — the reputational blow of being a felon does not spell disaster.

Maybe if these banks had cheated on some standardized tests, real criminal penalties and jail time would be handed out.

1 comment:

  1. Taking large settlements from banks and never charging the individuals within those organizations essentially makes settlements just a part of doing business--therefore it ends up being paid off by higher fees by you and me. Of further concern, is the fact that the settlement money gets handed over to the most corrupt legislature in the nation--a large pool of money that can serve as a further source of corruption. It is like putting crack in front of an addict to put more than $5B in the hands of our corrupt legislators. So you and I directly fund bank fraud--which then provides new government revenue that corrupt legislators allocate--insuring much of the money benefits the large donors of the legislators. What a happy circle of thieves--the only people hurt in this glorious scheme are the little guys who get foreclosed on and pay higher bank fees to cover the cost of fraud. Sickening!