Perdido 03

Perdido 03

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Mulgrew On King's Evaluation System: We Supported And Shaped This Piece Of Shit (UPDATED)

Mulgrew is spinning the evaluation system decision already:

Dear colleagues,
Late on Saturday, June 1, State Education Commissioner John King is expected to release an evaluation plan for K-12 teachers in New York City. It will be done through a binding arbitration process and take effect in September.
The mayor and the DOE will no doubt try to spin Commissioner King’s decision to their advantage. The UFT staff will be working through Sunday to get accurate information about the new system out to you by Monday morning in a form that is both clear and concise.
The process to create a new evaluation system has been long and contentious. The final decision came to rest with the commissioner because the city Department of Education proved incapable of negotiating in good faith with us.
The UFT and the DOE each submitted lengthy proposals to the State Education Department on May 8. Arbitration hearings are taking place in Albany today and tomorrow. Commissioner King will consider the proposals and decide on the final evaluation system on June 1.
We have the opportunity to use our collective-bargaining rights to modify aspects of the evaluation plan during future contract negotiations. Practically speaking, since we are in fact-finding now, if any changes were negotiated, they would not take effect until the 2014-15 school year.
Because the commissioner’s plan must be in accordance with the 2010 state law on teacher evaluation that this union supported and helped shape, we expect it to be fair, professional and focused on teacher development to the benefit of our students. The new evaluation system as set out in state law is designed first and foremost to help teachers improve their skills throughout their careers. Teachers who are struggling will get support tailored to their individual needs.
We have our work cut out for us in September, given this DOE’s terrible track record of translating policy to practice compounded with the fact that they will probably be gone come Jan. 1. We have started working on a professional development plan and we will use our rights to make sure that the new system is implemented fairly. It is a big help that we already have an appeals process for New York City teachers nailed down that will give our members stronger due process rights than they have ever had.
I hope this email clarifies where we are and what we can expect. Working together, we will make this transition. You can count on your union to continue to fight to get you the support you deserve. Thank you for all that you do for our city’s schoolchildren.
Sincerely,
Michael Mulgrew
Michael Mulgrew


Let's repeat - the union supported and helped shape this piece of shit.

Remember that next year when the nightmare commences.

This is Mulgrew's system - he supported APPR, he helped design the SLO's, he promoted growth models, he signed off on the VAM's.

And let's not forget that he gladly conceded power to John King, NYSED Commissioner/rookie teacher, to act as an independent arbitrator in this when King is anything but that.

This is Mulgrew's piece of shit all around.

Remember who to blame when this piece of shit splatters next year.

Not Cuomo.

Not Bloomberg.

Not King.

Mulgrew.

He could have fought this, he could have issued an alternative vision to APPR.

He instead chose to support it.

The problem will not be with implementation by the DOE.

The problem will be with the system itself.

The problem will be that our union helped design it and supported it all the way through.

UPDATE: Very good piece at NYC Eye on the difference between the Buffalo Teachers Federation and the United Teachers Federation in dealing with APPR.

Just more evidence that Mulgrew wants this APPR system.

5 comments:

  1. When Weingarten talks about "solutions-driven unionism," this is what she's referring to.

    In her model, having a "seat at the table" entails trying to sell the Overclass on the notion that the union can co-manage these programs, by helping the membership go along. They'll be happy to oblige, until Weingarten/Mulgrew's sell-out unionism has outlived its usefulness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good piece at NYC Eye on the differences between the UFT and the BTF

      http://nyceye.blogspot.com/2013/05/buffalo-teachers-feds-evaluations-suit.html:

      Delete
    2. Thanks, RBE.

      I think that the Buffalo teacher union's suit, on the grounds that the evaluations could be used towards terminations is explosive.

      The UFT DOES NOT want us to know about this. Jim Jones style, they're trying to get us to drink the Kool-Aid to think that an evaluation plan with terminations tie-ins is OK and a "reform." But the UFT is too tied with Cuomo, Tisch and King.

      Delete
    3. I agree, Geo. The UFT is too tied to Cuomo, Tisch and King. But if the Buffalo union is successful at fighting this, the UFT leadership will not be able to keep that news from spreading through the UFT ranks. They won't be able to keep people from wondering why the UFT wasn't doing something similar.

      Delete