Perdido 03

Perdido 03
Showing posts with label MTA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label MTA. Show all posts

Saturday, January 23, 2016

Remembering When Andrew "I Am The Government" Cuomo Shut The Subways For 7.8 Inches Of Snow

Looks like Mayor de Blasio was looking to head off last year's "Cuomo shuts the MTA without telling NYC!" story line this time around:

In 2015, also in January, a snow storm was expected to be a monster, but fizzled out. As it approached, the mayor urged people to use mass transit, but then Gov. Andrew Cuomo, shut down the subway system, leaving many stranded. The mayor said Thursday that this time around, that will not happen.

He reiterated Friday that the public transit system would continue as normal. "I don't think this is a situation where the MTA would consider shutting down the system," he said, referencing the system shutdown a year ago. "I think we all learned some good lessons from that situation."

Last January, Cuomo shut the MTA down on short notice for what turned out to be a pretty routine snowstorm - Brooklyn Paper covered that Cuomo debacle quite well:


Ghost trains are running under Brooklyn tonight.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s move to shut off the city’s subway system overnight on Monday ahead of an anticipated blizzard came as a surprise to transit workers and runs against common sense, because the trains need to move as part of keeping the tracks clear and will be running all night anyway, according to a transit insider. The governor’s 6 pm announcement that subway and bus service would be halted completely at 11 pm blindsided the Metropolitan Transportation Authority’s Incident Command Center, where workers first heard about it on the news, said the source, who lacks authorization to speak about internal matters and asked to remain anonymous.

The claim that trains were running empty appeared to be confirmed by the NYC Subway Time app for Android, which says it uses real-time data provided by the Transportation Authority. Around midnight, the app showed activity in both directions on all train lines in the city. The only exceptions were Manhattan’s 42nd Street Shuttle and the B and C trains, which do not run at night.

The halting of subway service is the first ever for a snowstorm. It is ill-considered because an actual turning-off of the entire system requires moving all the cars to far-flung facilities for storage, as the agency did during Hurricane Sandy, when flooding was a concern, and rebooting from that takes ages, the insider said. Emergency personnel will be riding the trains overnight while no one else is allowed to, per the source. The closure will strand people and put lives at risk, not because the subways can’t run, but because Cuomo wants to look good, the source said.

“I think it’s horrible, purely political decision, not based on anything that’s needed,” the insider said. “It seemed like cutting out a necessary lifeline unnecessar­ily.”

As much as two feet of snow are expected tonight and into tomorrow. Schools, courts, and offices have closed, and Cuomo has ordered drivers off the streets starting at 11 pm, under threat of arrest.
“This blizzard is forecasted to be one of the worst this region has seen, and we must put safety first and take all the necessary precautions,” Cuomo said in a statement. “Commuters and drivers need to get home before the storm completely cripples our transit networks and roads.”

The lack of ground transportation options makes keeping the subway open all the more important, the transit source said.

“The underground lifeline should be open,” the source said.

During snowstorms, limited closures along low-lying, outdoor sections of track such as the Brighton B and Q line makes sense, but the majority of the subway system runs on underground and elevated lines that are largely protected from the storms’ impact, the insider said.

A Twitter exchange between a Transportation Authority data scientist and a New York Post reporter appears to corroborate the agency being caught off guard by the governor’s announcement. Shortly before Cuomo’s bombshell, the transit wonk wrote that outdoor portions of the N, A, and Q, lines may be suspended. But when the reporter pointed out Cuomo was saying the plug would be pulled, the worker deferred to public relations.

Later, the data scientist lamented that stranded New Yorkers might resort to loosely regulated services such as Uber to catch now-illegal rides through the storm.

“Not a good plan from the governor,” Samuel Wong wrote. “The startup procedures will be fun.”
Following publication of this article, Wong wrote that the changes meant many workers would have to “stay overnight.”

Early Tuesday morning, a transit agency spokesman confirmed that “a handful” of trains were running in the system to prevent rust buildup on the rails, including trains equipped with scrapers and de-icing sprayers. Work crews were also being transported by subway, the spokesman said. The spokesman declined to comment on the efficacy of the service cancellation but said Cuomo made the decision in consultation with transit agency chairman Tom Prendergast.

On Monday afternoon, Prendergast said there would be “no reason” to halt underground service.
“I don’t believe so,” he said when asked if such a stoppage was likely. “Because there’d be no reason — because we’d be able to run trains.”

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is effectively controlled by the governor, who nominates the members of its 17-person board. Members are confirmed by the state Senate.

So Cuomo shut the subways down for the first time in the system's 111 year history for a snowstorm and, in the end, Central Park got 7.8 inches of snow.

Even better, he shut it down without giving a heads-up to anybody in the city government or, apparently, the MTA.

It's fun to remember stories like this as the current blizzard drops a couple of inches an hour and the National Weather Service is forecasting 18-24 inches of snow for NYC (with some models suggesting even higher totals possible.)

With Cuomo NOT ordering the subways shut because the system would have to run anyway (and it would take an extra day to start it up again), it appears Cuomo did indeed learn from his MTA snowmageddon debacle last year - hey, consult with the experts before making announcements!

It seems even a fevered ego in search of absolute power can, as de Blasio said, "learn some good lessons from that situation."

Monday, January 18, 2016

Cuomo Steals $500 Million From CUNY To Pay For Subways

Nicole Gelinas in the NY Post:

The subways, commuter rails, buses, bridges and tunnels need $29 billion every five years in repairs and upgrades to barely keep up with a growing city. The fares you pay don’t cover this cost — they don’t even cover paying the people who run the trains to come to work.

So where to get the money?

Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio said late last year that, don’t worry, they’d find it. To fill the gap left over after the MTA borrows money and Washington sends us their share, the state would put in $8.3 billion over five years, and the city would put in $2.5 billion.

People wondered last year where Cuomo and de Blasio would get this money, and were told to wait till next year.

Well, it’s next year — and the governor’s new budget makes the answer clear.

The grandchildren of the L-train hipsters will pay. Instead of putting in $8.3 billion, Cuomo has reserved only $1.4 billion over five years — a little less than $300 million a year.

Worse: To pay for this, he’s slashing the state’s funding of the City of University of New York — by about $500 million a year.

The rest of the costs get shunted off to the future, when Governor Cuomo is long gone from power and people won't blame him for the mess he has made.

As for CUNY, the Post reported yesterday that Cuomo has hatched a secret plan to subsume CUNY into SUNY, in part because he doesn't control CUNY and doesn't like anything he doesn't control and in part because the CUNY board members don't suck up to him the way the SUNY board members do and he hates not having suck-ups on the CUNY board.

So it's all good, you know - for Cuomo, at any rate.

As for the rest of us, the city's university system is on the chopping the block, the transit system is falling into third world status and the "luxury" buildings keep going up without the needed infrastructure to support the increased population numbers going up with them.

Quite an agenda from our governor.

Saturday, January 9, 2016

Cuomo Subway Station Shutdown Plan Savaged

Gothamist readers react to the news that Governor Cuomo will shut down 30 subway stations for as long as a year to "re-invision" them for WiFi, USB charging ports, and countdown clocks as well as his plan to replace the MTA metrocard with a smartphone app:

A YEAR? What the fuck could you possibly do in a station that could take a year? I could hand-replace every single tile in a subway station, working alone, in less than a year.
They built the fucking Empire State Building in a year!
...

What the flying fuck?!?! Who gives a shit about wi-fi? Shouldn't that effort (and money) go towards reducing delays on the trains and overcrowding? (I know these are rhetorical questions..humour me.)

...

The train by my house is being completely shutdown for 14 months! As is the second closest stop. How do they expect me to get to work? Time to move I guess 😒.

...

Serious question: Does anyone know what the alternative will be to using a cellphone to get into the station? I only carry a cellphone at certain times for personal reasons, and even when I do it is not one with all the gadgets. Are they really going to not let people use the subway if they won't own and carry (powered on) a complex cellphone?
...

By 2022, or whenever this new system is ready, the cell phone as we know it today will probably be a thing of the past.. as will RFID... so it'll be interesting.

...
Everyone who runs the MTA, including the governor, should be in jail.

...

This is so far out of touch as to Enter the Theater of The Absurd. Clearly this half baked idea is one developed by people who don't live in The City or use the MTA. FINISH the work on The Second Avenue Subway before beginning another major renovation. People who use public transportation do not need WIFI, they Need to get to Work and Home. Closing down stations on an already overcrowded system is beyond dangerous. When the last time any of these nincompoops used the MTA during rushhour?
...
Hey, nobody in Astoria really needs to get to work, right? And none of the businesses on those main drags are going to notice the lack of customers, right? COUNCIL MEMBER! I NEED YOU! (Seriously...that is every station on the N/Q line between Queensboro Plaza and Astoria Boulevard!)
...
How can cuomo be building the subway of the next century when the 2nd avenue extension is now behind under his watch?

...
QR codes would be an utter fucking disaster.
As if airport boarding passes haven't already proven that they're unsuitable for fast-track processing?
Even under optimal conditions they're sub-optimal at processing people at speed. People are going to spend even longer blocking the turnstiles while they dick around with their iPhones to pull up the QR app than they already do pulling out a simple ticket.
Plus anything based on visual recognition is going to have a lens that gets scratched and/or vandalized to fuck.
Can we not just get a sensible contactless/NFC system?

...

QR CODES? SERIOUSLY?!
No, we couldn't take one of the dozen or so existing contactless payment systems already in use and deployed around the world (Oyster, for example), we're going to build a brand new thing based on the most embarrassing technology fad of 2014, which will require you to have your smartphone unlocked with the app on display as you approach the turnstile and will require a working camera behind a not-scratched-to-shit glass plate.
Bet your last dollar on this: this disaster will not be deployed any time before 2022, and when it does you will hate it with the fury of a supernova.
...
Astoria has just been sodomized without lube by the MTA.

...
How about making the cars not smell like urine. that's a little more important than wifi and charging stations. please.

...
So the Subway "for the next 100 years" is going to use barcode scanning technology we've had in supermarkets for 20 years instead of something like NFC that could be used without taking the device out of pocket? Fail.

...

I assumed the smartphone scan would just be an option, with a regular paper ticket still available for purchase, like NJ Transit does now. Smartphone-only turnstiles sound like a nightmare.
 ...
It's kind of messed up that only people who can afford a smartphone (and accompanying plan) can take a freaking subway ride. That's absurd.
 ...
"Ladies and gentlemen, protect your personal property...keep your
belongings in sight at all times. Do not display cell phones or other
electronic devices. Remain alert and have a safe day. But please disregard all of this, because you'll have to have your most valuable items in full view to enter the subway turnstile."
...
Request: Please make the N/Q run without as many delays and overcrowding
Response: FUCK YOU WE ARE GOING TO PAINT FOREVER


Dunno how representative these commenters are to New Yorkers as a whole, but Cuomo's "big" MTA "re-invision" plan is not going over well at Gothamist.

Cuomo's desperate these days to put his mark on the state, with all these capital projects, but as always with Sheriff Andy, the plans are big on headlines, short on practical details and where the money is coming from to pay for them.
 
God help us all if Cuomo gets this plan going.

Friday, January 8, 2016

Cuomo To Shut Down 30 MTA Subway Stations For USB Ports, Countdown Clocks And New Signs

Anybody out there use the 6th Avenue M/F stop at 23rd Street?

Say goodbye to it for a while, maybe as long as a year - this came during Cuomo's press conference today touting his transit agenda for 2016:

MTA Chairman Thomas Prendergast took to the podium Friday as well, promising to "re-invision" 30 subway stations by 2020. The MTA plans to make these stations "cleaner, brighter... easier to navigate, with better and more intuitive wayfinding, as well as a modernized look and feel." This means more On The Go touch screens, new signage, new lighting.

Rather than close these stations on nights and weekends to accomplish this "renewal"—the Governor described the current approach as "piecemeal"—the MTA will shut down entire stations for an average six to twelve-months per station to expedite renovations. Will your neighborhood's subway station be one of them? Read it and weep/breathe a sigh of relief.

One of the stations on the list to be shut for "re-invision"?

The very busy 23rd Street M/F stop.

Because what's more important than being able to get off at your stop for work?

Why USB ports, countdown clocks and new signs!

The M/F 23rd Street stop floods like a, well, like a mother -----, every time it rains, but that apparently is not going to be fixed by Cuomo - nor are some other important problems:

After Cuomo's announcement, some critics argued that the MTA is facing more pressing issues than, say, "customer-friendly" initiatives.

There's the issue of extreme overcrowding, for one, and the $1 billion in funding cut from the second phase of the ever-elusive Second Avenue Subway line (tunnel boring for Phase II, which will serve 96th through 125th Streets, is now projected to start no sooner than 2019). Ambitious East Side Access and Penn Station Access projects are still a pipe dream, and delays due to rail issues are a thing most New Yorkers are now wearily familiar with. 

But hey, we're going to have USB charging ports and mew signs- wheee!!!!!

Many commenters at Gothamist feel same way - here's one of my favorites:
"I don't want to get on a train and feel like a sardine for an hour and a half on the way to work. I don't want to do that," Cuomo extrapolated. "I want to be able to sit in a seat, I want to be able to listen to my music, I want to be able to make a telephone call, be connected to Wi-Fi. I've come to expect that."

OH MY GOD SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU GODDAMN TONEDEAF UPSTATE PIECE OF SHIT

And here's another:

Oh good. My station is on the list. Fuck you, Cuomo. The "piecemeal" approach may be slower, but if it allows a station to remain open that's highly preferable. That piece of shit truly cannot comprehend how completely closing a station for a year fucks people over.

All right - I got a couple more for you:

IS THIS MAN on FUCKING CRACK?????

To which someone replies:

Too much of Sandra Lee's Kwanzaa Cake this year.

M/F indeed.

Monday, November 23, 2015

Cuomo To Bus + Bus + Train Commuters: Screw You

Perhaps MTA commuters would get a better hearing from Governor Cuomo if they gave him a bag full of money first like his real estate donors:

Gov. Cuomo vetoed bipartisan legislation that would have provided fare relief to commuters who have to take two buses and a train to reach their destination.

The measure, which overwhelmingly passed the state Legislature in June, would have allowed riders on some routes to get two free transfers instead of one within two hours.

MetroCards now allow one free transfer between a subway and a bus or between two buses during a two-hour period.

As part of their commute, most of these riders have to take two buses before reaching the subway and are paying two fares, said the bill’s sponsors, Assemblyman Jeff Dinowitz (D-Bronx) and Sen. Martin Golden (R-Brooklyn).

The MTA claims the second transfer would cost a bundle, Cuomo claims riders can buy an unlimited card and it's all good.

But not everybody can afford an unlimited card and as for the MTA's claims that the second transfer will cost them too much money, well there is this:

But Dinowitz says Cuomo and the MTA are leaving riders in the lurch — especially those who cannot afford the monthly outlay for an unlimited-ride card.

“The MTA is not known for putting out accurate numbers,” he said. “It’s just not fair for people who, through no fault of their own, have to take three rides and are in a two-fare zone.”

Meanwhile today Cuomo said he's not ready to stop taking money from the crooked real estate company at the center of the Silver and Skelos corruption trials.

Priorities, priorities.

Friday, July 31, 2015

Cuomo's Legacy? Corruption And Unpaid Bills For Big Projects

The NY Times today:

It is a commonly held belief among political leaders: Long after they have left office, they will be remembered in large part for legacy projects that outlast their political lives, if not their natural ones.

In less than five years, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York, a Democrat, has managed to move ahead on two such projects: a replacement for the Tappan Zee Bridge over the Hudson River between Rockland and Westchester Counties, and an overhaul of La Guardia Airport in Queens.

Political analysts say the governor’s penchant for large-scale projects is unmatched among his recent predecessors, and is reminiscent of the administration of Nelson A. Rockefeller, the Republican who was elected to four terms as governor and whose lengthy construction resume included state office buildings and college campuses.

“It’s in the sinews of Andrew Cuomo’s very way of viewing what the role of a governor is,” said Bruce N. Gyory, a political consultant who served in the administrations of three New York governors. “In that sense, we haven’t had a governor who had both the interest and the financial underpinnings to sustain a building agenda since Rockefeller.”

The interest and financial underpinnings to sustain the biggest building agenda since Rockefeller?

What "financial underpinnings"?

But Mr. Cuomo’s zeal for marquee construction projects has come with some consequences. It remains unclear how, exactly, the state will pay for the estimated $3.9 billion Tappan Zee replacement, and how high the tolls may climb for those who cross it.

The state had hoped to use a $511 million loan from a clean water fund toward the Tappan Zee project, but the federal Environmental Protection Agency rejected most of that plan.

As for the improvements at La Guardia, Mr. Cuomo has said the first phase of the ambitious plan, which involves replacing the central terminal, would cost $4 billion. In January, he proposed constructing a rail link that would connect the airport to the subway system in Queens; he was vague about where the estimated $450 million needed to build it would come from.

Likewise, Delta Air Lines has not said how much it would spend to help achieve Mr. Cuomo’s vision of a “unified” La Guardia, but the company said this week that it was committed to redeveloping Terminals C and D in conjunction with the replacement of the central terminal.


Cuomo's legacy will be grandiose press conferences about grandiose building projects with grandiose price tags that eventually get paid by taxes, tolls, fees and levies against the not-so-grandiose in this state - the working and middles classes.

That and corruption, of course.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

NYU Rudin Center For Transporation Policy: Access To Mass Transit Is The "Great Equalizer" In NYC, Not Education

Fascinating piece by Christopher Robbins at Gothamist that says the Rudin Center for Transporation Policy and Management has produced a report that purports to demonstrate that access to mass transit in NYC is more important than education in terms of economic opportunity:

Public transit is New York City's crucial equalizer in matters of housing and employment. This fact would be uncontroversial, except Governor Cuomo has balked at providing the MTA with the $32 billion in capital funds it needs to function and improve. A new report [PDF] shows how transportation plays a huge role in the earning power of New Yorkers.

NYU's Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management looked at 177 different zip codes, and found that neighborhoods with the best access to transit, usually in Manhattan, (Chelsea is number one [PDF]) also have the highest median household income, and the lowest unemployment rate. In those neighborhoods, 79% commute by walking or public transit, and only 10.9% by car.

Neighborhoods with the worst access to transit (South Staten Island) had lower median incomes ($61,381) and slightly lower unemployment rates (9.7%), but more than 50% commuted by car.

The neighborhoods with limited access to public transit, like the Flatlands in Brooklyn, fare the worst: their unemployment rate is nearly 12%, and their median household income is around $46,000.
The more jobs you can reasonably commute to within an hour, the more job opportunities you'll have, and the higher your wage will be.

Cuomo is set to "break" the public school system in NYC because he says the current system hurts children and harms their future economic potential.

But Rudin Center Director Mitchell Moss says Cuomo could do more for economic opportunity if he would just, you know, fully fund the MTA:

“In New York, mass transit is the path to economic mobility, not education,” Mitchell Moss, Rudin's director, told the Wall Street Journal. “It’s far more important to have a MetroCard than a college degree.”

...

"What’s really important for the future to metropolitan transit is winning a fully-funded, $32 billion five-year rebuilding program, which is being considered in Albany right now," Gene Russianoff of the Straphangers Campaign said in November. "That means our politicians have to find the money to buy us new subway cars and buses, rehabilitated station, safe track and computerized signals. Otherwise, its back to the big ugly. New Yorkers cannot afford that."


I think access to a quality education, along with access to public transportation, are both important.

Cuomo, who claims he cares for the future of children while teachers and the education bureaucracy don't, doesn't intend to properly fund either.

As part of his Port Authority reform, Cuomo is calling for mass transit cuts (albeit, on the NY/NJ lines, not the MTA lines.)

But just as his education policies the first four years show how little he cares for public education, his refusal to provide the MTA with the money needed to make upgrades shows how little he cares for public transportation.

Andrew Cuomo, staunch believer that the free market fairy solves all, likes the word "privatized" in front of words like "education" and "transportation" as much as possible.

Friday, July 18, 2014

Was This The Best The LIRR Unions Could Do?

Given the leverage the LIRR unions had in their negotiations, it being an election year and all, if these reports are accurate, this is a pretty bad deal:

"Under terms of the deal, current LIRR employees will receive a 17 percent wage increase over six-and-a-half years. The union had been seeking six years, and the MTA seven. To pay for the additional salary expenses, all employees will for the first time contribute to their health insurance, the governor said. New employees will have a different wage progression and retirement contributions. The agreement doesn’t include fare increases, Cuomo said."

If what Cuomo said is what's actually in the deal, then the union leadership conceded on health care contributions and they ate their young on wage progression and retirement contributions.

Those concessions sure do diminish the 17% wage increase over 6.5 years.

I've written this over and over, but I'm going to do so once again:

Making that first-time concession on health care contributions is ALWAYS a loss.

Once you open the door to ANY contributions to health care, you hit the slippery slope of concessions on health care/increased payments from employees EVERY time the contract comes up for re-negotiation.

They couldn't do better than this in an election year with a strike deadline looming?

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

What Are The Chances Of An LIRR Strike Happening?

Given what happened to Mario Cuomo over an LIRR strike in 1994, the chances that Andrew Cuomo let's this one happen this year are pretty small.

My sense is, the governor will jettison into the negotiations and force a settlement before the strike starts.

What say you out there?

Does the strike go off?

Or does Cuomo jettison in as "savior"?

And if you think Cuomo does jettison in and force a solution, which side do you think comes out the "winner"?

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Cuomo Is Full Of Shit

On Monday, Sheriff Andy Cuomo said this about the looming possibility of an LIRR strike because the MTA and the LIRR unions can't come to a contract agreement:

“It’s actually Congress that can end a strike and impose a settlement one way or the other,” he said. “So right now it seems that Congress is pivotal to what happens here, and from what I read in the newspapers it’s going to depend on what Congress intends to do….”

Cuomo added that “Congress can order a settlement, Congress can order mediation, Congress can order arbitration, Congress can do almost whatever they want, because they are in control of the resolution of the strike.”

Here was Cuomo today:


False belief put forward by the unions that Congress could help avert the LIRR strike?

The guy who put forward the false belief that Congress could help avert the LIRR strike was Sheriff Andy Cuomo himself.

Stop blaming the unions, Sheriff Andy.

You were the guy who pushed that meme.

MTA Looks To Get Congress Involved In MTA/LIRR Unions Dispute

From the NY Post:

The MTA’s negotiations with unions representing LIRR workers broke down Tuesday afternoon, 12 days before hundreds of thousands of Long Islanders would be left stranded by a strike.

With the walkout looming, MTA Chairman Thomas Prendergast penned a letter to US Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner asking them to say what role Congress would play if 5,400 workers walk off the job on July 20.

And from Newsday:

LIRR union officials said they were willing to continue talking Tuesday with Metropolitan Transportation Authority negotiators before the National Mediation Board until a deal was made. However, after meeting less than four hours in Manhattan, MTA negotiators said it became clear a settlement could not be reached.

"Nothing is going to happen at the table here clearly, based on what happened today, and that's why we're going to Congress," MTA spokesman Adam Lisberg said after the talks.

You can see the strategy from the MTA and Governor Cuomo here - try and have Congress force an end to any job action by the LIRR unions, thus taking away a key weapon in the LIRR unions arsenal.

So far, Congress doesn't sound like its willing to act:

Before the negotiation, Prendergast began making plans to go to Washington, D.C., to meet with congressional members and "seek clarification on what role Congress intends to play in the event" of a July 20 strike, according to a letter he sent to federal lawmakers.

The letter was addressed to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).

An aide to McConnell said yesterday that he saw the letter but did not know of any request for a meeting from Prendergast. Reid's office had no comment, and House leaders could not be reached for comment.

...

Rep. Peter King (R-Seaford) Tuesday encouraged the MTA to keep talking to the unions, not federal lawmakers.

"These guys should be spending more time at the table than trying to position themselves as far as Congress is concerned," said King, who heard from Prendergast Monday about arranging a meeting.
King, who will host the MTA chairman Wednesday along with Rep. Charles Rangel (D-Manhattan), said he and other members of New York's delegation won't likely tell both sides what they intend to do or give them "an out" from negotiating a settlement.

Rep. Steve Israel (D-Huntington) agreed that depending on congressional action is the wrong course, "considering that there's no promise that the House Republican Majority will take up the issue at all."

Cuomo tried to wash his hands of the matter earlier in the week, claiming this was a federal matter for Congress to deal with.

Cuomo's simply trying to displace responsibility here so that he doesn't have to own a strike if it happens - especially since a strike would come a few months before Election Day and might leave him with some political damage.

But Congress, at least so far, doesn't sound like they're going to help Sheriff Andy or the MTA out.

Monday, July 7, 2014

Cuomo Says He Won't Intervene In LIRR Strike

You know it's an election year and Governor Cuomo needs union support when you hear him make statements like this:

Gov. Cuomo isn't planning to intervene to stop a strike on the Long Island Rail Road. That's a job for Congress, he said.

Cuomo said the labor strife at the LIRR is different from other state union disputes because it is covered by federal transportation law.

“The LIRR is a little different, because the way the law is written it is actually Congress that can end a strike and impose a settlement, one way or the other,” Cuomo told reporters in Manhattan. “So right now, it seems that Congress is pivotal to what happens and from what I read in the newspapers it is going to depend on what Congress intends to do.”

Cuomo’s comments came after a group of state senators from Long Island called on the governor to intervene in the negotiations and prevent a strike.

Any other time and Cuomo would be talking tough against the union and the workers.

But things are a little dicey for Sheriff Andy these days.

There's a likely challenger in the Democratic Primary looking to take him on from the left, bad feelings remain for some union rank-and-file after union leaders forced a Working Families Party endorsement of the anti-union Cuomo, and he faces a capable GOP opponent in Rob Astorino who, while he can't seem to raise much money or garner much poll support, still gives Cuomo a challenge this time around (unlike in 2010 when he had Crazy Carl Paladino up against him.)

Cuomo doesn't want to upset any apple carts by taking a public stance in this labor negotiation.

Still, this is a story to keep an eye on as we get closer to the strike deadline.

Cuomo definitely does not want an LIRR strike a few months before Election Day and I am sure there are some things going on behind the scenes so that Sheriff Andy gets the outcome he wants in this battle - no strike.

Thursday, June 26, 2014

LIRR Unions Do Not Take Kindly To Newest MTA Offer, Negotiation Strategy

From the Daily News:

The MTA’s decision to publicize its newest contract offer to LIRR workers — who are threatening a strike next month — has union leaders considering whether to ditch a new round of negotiations set for Friday.

Anthony Simon, a spokesman for a coalition of Long Island Rail Road unions, which can legally strike as early as July 20, faulted the Metropolitan Transportation Authority for releasing to the media details of its proposal before the planned talks.

“Instead of sitting down with the only people who can make a deal, the MTA chose the route of cheap political grandstanding,” Simon said. “It’s painfully clear the MTA is not serious about negotiating a settlement.”

The MTA’s offer — 17% in raises over seven years — was publicized Tuesday, and represented an improvement over the previous proposal of 11% in pay increases over six years plus work-rule changes.

In earlier negotiations, the MTA had asked the unions, which have been without a contract since 2010, to accept a pay freeze unless the cost of raises was covered completely by work-rule changes. “We’ve moved considerably,” MTA Chairman Tom Prendergast said after the authority’s board held its monthly meeting Wednesday.

...
The labor impasse persists despite two separate rounds of independent mediation from panels selected by the White House. Both panels recommended 17% in raises over six years.

...

The MTA’s proposal would eventually lead to savings, because it would require new hires to contribute more of their earnings for health care and pensions than current employees do.

Something to keep an eye on for three reasons:
1. The LIRR unions can legally strike
2. Governor Cuomo is not going to want a strike in July, a little over three and a half months before his re-election bid
3. Therefore the LIRR unions have considerable leverage in this fight, especially since both independent mediation panels that weighed in on the impasse recommended substantially higher raises than the MTA is offering

Monday, May 5, 2014

Another Sham From Andrew Cuomo

Remember when Cuomo parachuted in to save the TWU/MTA contract deal?

Turns out the whole thing was orchestrated by Cuomo's office to make him look the "hero":

If the latest episode of the MTA-TWU drama seemed a bit scripted, it’s for good reason.
It was scripted.

In what might be dubbed the “Fairy Tale of Albany” or the “White Knight from Mount Kisco,” the hero who saved the day was Gov. Cuomo. He came to town during Holy Week and helped get a new contract — with retroactive raises and improved benefits — for some 34,000 bus and subway workers who have been toiling without one for more than two years.

This wasn’t a covert maneuver. It was more like Paul Revere coming to town, but in a souped-up muscle car.

On April 16, Transport Workers Union Local 100 set the stage for the charade rescue with a letter that urged Cuomo to get personally involved in negotiations.

A Cuomo staffer pushed the theme in a phone call with me that night. Local 100 and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority had made some progress but not on major issues like wages and health care costs, he whispered. The administration staffer would only talk on “background,” meaning his name or position was not to be printed.

“They are far apart on the big stuff,” the staffer said.

In reality, much of the contract had been hammered out by the two negotiators: MTA Chairman Tom Prendergast and TWU Local 100 President John Samuelsen. The two men had been meeting privately for days at MTA headquarters — and at Cuomo’s Midtown office.

On Thursday, the next day — the very next day after the staffer said the two sides were far apart — the White Knight announced that a new contract had been achieved.

“Everything was being orchestrated,” one government official familiar with the Holy Week crusade said to me afterwards. “All of it. The timing. When it was done. How it was done. Nothing was left to chance.”

Local 100 was more than willing to go along with whatever script came from Albany in order to get the deal, which doesn't have "zero" percent raises for any of the years it covers and beats the emerging municipal wage pattern.

“We’d stand on our heads if that’s what he wants us to do,” one union staffer said.

 ...

It was all in the script. Nothing left up to chance for a governor running for re-election.

Not much different than the Cuomo/Moskowitz charter rally, which was suggested by Cuomo's office to Moskowitz's people as a way to stick it to de Blasio on charters.

Cuomo runs his governorship the way many so-called "reality' shows are run - everything is totally scripted and nothing is left to chance.

Saturday, April 19, 2014

How Union Contracts Get Covered In The Media

From the ever municipal union-friendly NY Post:

A day after the MTA offered its workers a new contract with retroactive pay, Mayor de Blasio insisted the deal doesn’t set a precedent for the city’s ongoing negotiations with its unions.

“We have a very different reality here — we have our fiscal circumstances. We have a separate history in terms of labor relations than that which state and MTA has,” the mayor said Friday at a press conference in Brooklyn.

“So we’re going to do things our own way with our partners in municipal labor.”

Chuck Brecher, research director at the Citizens Budget Commission, agreed that the proposed MTA deal — an 8 percent raise spread over five years — doesn’t directly impact the mayor’s options.

“He doesn’t have to be bound by any other model, and to the extent there’s been pattern bargaining, the pattern is usually what’s happened to other city unions rather than state,” Brecher said.

He estimated that if the city were to follow in the MTA’s footsteps the tab this year would run about $3.5 billion — and that doesn’t even include teachers-union demands for retroactive pay dating back to 2009.

The mayor has said previously there’s no way the city could afford to pay full retroactive pay to all 152 unions that have been working under expired contracts.

Ah, but when the state pattern was the old CSEA contract of 4% over 5 years, with three years of zeroes and health care concessions, that's when the editorial boards thought de Blasio should follow the state pattern (even though, as this Post article points out, pattern bargaining is relegated to what happens in city contracts, not state contracts.)

Funny how that is.

Even funnier is how the the MTA/TWU 100 deal is being talked about as if it's some grand giveaway, even though, as NYC Educator points out here, the MTA contract actually leaves TWU 100 workers a little bit behind inflation, so it's not that swell a deal at all.

Sure, the TWU contract is better than the CSEA contract pattern that came before, but it's still not replete with a "bunch of new goodies" as the Post's resident Ayn Randian specialist Nicole Gelinas says it is.

Somehow we've gotten to this point in American culture where any contract that pays union workers just below the rate of inflation, doesn't shove too many onerous work rules on them, and only nails them with a half percent in health care concessions is "full of goodies."

Meanwhile on Wall Street, the criminals at Bank of America and Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase continue to lose money hand over fist due to bad bets and/or criminal penalties lodged by the feds for fraudulent activity and yet, they still keep paying themselves more money.

Funny how that it is too.
 
Can't wait to see the Nicole Gelinas piece criticizing that.

Oh, right - that's the "free market".

You know, the one with the Too Big To Fail banks who took all those government bailouts after nearly taking the world economy to total collapse.

Friday, April 18, 2014

MTA/TWU Contract Agreement May "Set The Floor" For Other Contract Negotiations In City And State

First, some of the details of the contract:

Under the MTA pact, members of the TWU Local 100 would receive retroactive pay increases of 1% for each of the past two years and 2% increases in each of the following three years. The deal would also give the union employees paid maternity and paternity leave, as well as increased optical and dental benefits.

In a concession to the MTA, the employees would contribute 2% of their salaries for health-care benefits, up from 1.5%. 

A person familiar with the matter said that in another concession by the union, new hires wouldn't receive full pay rates until they worked five years. 


And the effect this contract agreement may have on other municipal and state contract negotiations:

The TWU's labor deal could have implications for other bargaining units within the MTA, and potentially set a pattern for a union of Long Island Rail Road employees who have been locked in their own labor battle with the agency.

New York City is also facing difficult negotiations with its some 350,000 workers who are also seeking back pay. The city says 152 of its collective bargaining units are without contracts, with the oldest expired as long as five years ago.

Rebecca Givan, assistant professor of labor studies at Rutgers University, said the Transport Workers agreement could set a benchmark for other labor groups. "It sets a floor for the municipal unions," she said. "None of the municipal unions will now want to take anything less than this."

Harry Nespoli, head of the city's sanitation union and the Municipal Labor Committee, an umbrella group of city unions, said he believes the retroactive pay increases in the MTA deal "definitely helps" the city unions in their negotiations with the de Blasio administration.

"Retroactive [pay] is very important to any of the unions that have been waiting for their contract," said Mr. Nespoli, whose union is without a contract for 2½ years.

As for concessions from the municipal unions, this contract agreement may set the floor for that too - the TWU agreed to health care concessions as part of the deal, something de Blasio wants from municipal unions:

Mr. Nespoli said he expected other unions that have outstanding contracts going further back than his union, notably the teachers union, will be settled before Mayor Bill de Blasio's administration moves to his union and others in a similar situation.

The mayor and top aides have said that the city is seeking concessions on health care, but Mr. Nespoli said he doesn't expect much progress there unless the city moves away from its position of no raises. Still, he said, the de Blasio administration deserves credit for engaging with the city unions.

"At least this administration is listening and is sitting down and talking to us and trying to get to some sort of settlement," Mr. Nespoli said. "And I hope we can get the settlement quicker than later."

One thing I'll say in this post regarding the UFT negotiations - I am completely against any health care concessions that has employees paying any of their health care.

Once that line is breached, every contract we'll be conceding more and more to health care costs.

You can see how that happened in this contract - from 1.5% for health care costs to 2%.

It goes up every contract, eating away whatever future raises you get.

I would rather take a zero on a year of retro than agree to pay any health care costs because in the long run, the 1% you get for a year of retro will be far outweighed by the money they take for health care costs that will just go up and up and up...

Best to keep the line on health care concessions for as long as you can, because once that line is breached, it never stops.

Funny What An Election Year Can Do To Politicians

Cuomo in January talking about contract negotiations:

Meeting with the Daily News Editorial Board Wednesday, the governor went out of his way to point out that he had negotiated state worker contracts that included three years of zero raises.

He did so in the aftermath of the national economic downturn, a time when inflation was essentially zero. Mayor Bloomberg took the same stance with the city’s unions, after having granted them generous raises for most of his tenure.

The unions chose to wait for the election of a new, presumably labor-friendlier mayor. They got de Blasio, and they now want him to ante up as much as $7.8 billion in back pay.

At the same time, Cuomo has taken his no-raise stance into negotiations over a lapsed contract that extends back to the same time period.

“We’re still trying to negotiate with the TWU, which is the subway workers’ union,” the governor said. “And it’s along the same parameters of three zeroes. So when you talk about the New York City labor unions and retroactive raises, that’s the pattern that has been set by the state unions: three zeroes.”

Asked if his fellow Democrat at City Hall should follow suit, Cuomo replied: “I don’t want to tell the mayor how to negotiate his contracts, but that’s how we negotiated ours.”

The message was clear: He wants de Blasio on the same page for the good of all taxpayers.

Cuomo yesterday:

Ending a two-year impasse, the MTA and the union for subway and bus workers in the city have agreed to a new contract that includes 8% raises over five years and no increase to the base fare, Gov. Cuomo announced Thursday.

The deal, brokered with the help of the governor, calls for the 34,000 members of the Transport Workers Union Local 100 to receive 1% retroactive pay raises for 2012 and 2013, and 2% pay increases for 2014 through 2016.

The deal also includes two weeks’ paid maternity and paternity leave, and improved dental and optical benefits.

“It was a long negotiation,” said Tom Prendergast, chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority. “What we have here is a fair wage settlement for employees, an agreement consistent with our financial plan.”

The agreement, which must be approved by the MTA board, came after Local 100 President John Samuelsen wrote to Cuomo on Tuesday night, requesting that he help overcome stumbling blocks in negotiations.

The terms of the deal are likely to influence contract talks with several other MTA unions, particularly ones for LIRR workers.

Cuomo said the deal would have little bearing, however, on Mayor de Blasio’s efforts to reach settlements with 152 municipal unions whose workers are laboring under expired contracts.
“I think these are separate situations,” Cuomo said. “The mayor will negotiate his contracts separately.”

This contract deal shows how desperate Cuomo was to avoid labor strife in an election year, especially the kind that leads to strike threats from the subways and/or rail unions.

It now works for city unions as a nice argument against the city or the newspaper editorial boards when they say full retro/increases every year in a contract are not possible.

Hey, Cuomo signed off on them, of course they're possible, that's the response when the concern trolls at the News or Post say the city can't afford either.

And any argument that the CSEA pattern holds for the city negotiations, a dubious argument before hand, though one that was pushed by Cuomo, is dead with this TWU 100 deal.

Clearly Cuomo is feeling a little squirrel-y over his re-election campaign prospects or he wouldn't have pushed the MTA to break the CSEA pattern.

Too bad the TWU 100 leadership didn't press him more.

Given the flak Cuomo is taking over Moreland, given the worries Cuomo has about a third party candidate entering the race and taking votes away from him, given the concerns he has about his "liberal" base and the unions abandoning him, and given his need to avoid even the talk of a transit strike by either MTA or LIRR workers in the months leading up to Election Day, I think they could have ultimately gotten more than they got.

That said, municipal union negotiators should be smiling today because they just got an early Christmas gift for their own negotiations with NYC.

Except for the UFT, of course, who will no doubt look to make the worst deal possible regardless and tell us it "scrapes the skies."

Thursday, April 17, 2014

More Details On TWU 100 Contract

More from Dana Rubenstein at Capital NY on the TWU 100 contract:

After two long years of stop-and-go negotiations, Governor Andrew Cuomo today announced that the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Transport Workers Union had struck a tentative labor contract deal.

The announcement, which was light on details, includes five years of annual wage increases, including 1 percent in the first two years, and 2 percent in each of the final three years, paid maternity and paternity leave, improved optical and dental benefits, and, noted union president John Samuelson, pointedly, "no zeros."

"The union believes that we've achieved many of the goals that we set out to achieve," said Samuelson.

Though the deal, which represents most subway and bus workers, does include small worker increases in health care contributions ("from 1.5 to 2 percent," according to Prendegast), the deal comes with no specific work rule reforms and appears, as a whole, to be a win for the T.W.U.

And the effect on the city unions:

As Steven Greenhouse noted when he broke news of the impending deal yesterday: "if the transit workers receive a contract that contains substantial raises, that could increase pressure on Mr. de Blasio to award sizable raises, when the city already says it cannot afford."

I think one can say one definitive thing about this contract settlement:

Cuomo is not all that comfortable with his re-election prospects.

Otherwise he wouldn't have been pushing the MTA to break the pattern set for state contracts by CSEA back in 2011.

Cuomo Announces Contract Deal Between MTA And TWU 100 - Raises In Each Year + Full Retro (UPDATE - 3:27 PM)

Here's a TWU 100 update:

Cuomo was asked at the press conference if this new TWU 100 contract sets the pattern for city contracts (no link, I was watching it live.)

Remember that he said a few months ago that the state pattern set the pattern for the city too.

That was when the pattern was three years of wage freezes and 4% over the final two years of a five year contract - the pattern set by the CSEA contract in 2011.

But now Cuomo says the state pattern is "separate" from the city pattern, de Blasio has his own negotiations to handle that are separate from the state's.

Funny how that changed.

More later as we get more details on the contract.

The big news appears to be there is a raise in each year of the contract and full retro for TWU 100 workers.

But the devil is, as always, in the details.

UPDATED - 3:27 PM:

So less than half the 17% recommended by the federal panel but a little more than double the CSEA deal that set the pattern back in 2011.

Also, there's this:


Not a great deal, in my opinion, given the panel recommendations and the leverage the unions had over Cuomo in a re-election year when he in no way wanted even the threat of a summer subway or LIRR strike.

But the deal does allow the city unions to claim full retro has to be on the table since TWU 100 says that's what they got.

Daily News: Cuomo Stepping In To Broker MTA/TWU 100 Deal (UPDATE - 1:50 PM)

As surmised in this morning's NY Times piece, Governor Cuomo is indeed stepping in to broker a deal between the MTA and TWU 100 over deadlocked contract negotiations that has brought about the possibility of a summer transit strike hitting just months before Cuomo hopes to get re-elected:

Gov. Cuomo is stepping into the heated contract talks between the MTA and the union representing 34,000 transit workers, the Daily News has learned.

Cuomo has been claiming the three wage freeze CSEA and PEF agreed to as part of their five year contracts set a "state pattern" that city unions must follow in contract negotiations with de Blasio.

The MTA has stuck to the three year wage freeze and 2% in each of the final two years of a five year contract in their negotiations with TWU 100 despite an arbitration board handing over a non-binding deal that gives 17% raises over five years and no freezes.

If Cuomo brokers a deal that is anything different than what he forced CSEA and PEF to take early on in his administration, the state pattern is effectively broken from the one set in 2011.

I would argue that the state pattern has nothing to do with the city pattern in any case, but the argument that Cuomo (and apparently de Blasio, according to a PBA ad noted by James Eterno at ICEUFT blog) has been pushing, that the CSEA contract of 4% over 5 years with three years of wage freezes, sets the patterns for all city and state unions would effectively be dead.

This is something to watch closely because it has implications for city workers.

UPDATE - 12:45 PM: Here is what deal is supposedly on the table:

The MTA and the union representing subway and bus workers in the city are close to reaching an agreement on a new contract that would grant workers an 8% raise over five years, according to sources familiar with the talks.

Under the package now on the table, new hires would have to work for five years before reaching the top pay rate, an increase of two years, and worker contributions to health care costs would rise to 2% of base pay, from 1.5%, the sources said.

...

The potential breakthrough was being closely watched by workers in other MTA unions, particularly Long Island Rail Road employees, due to the possibility it could set a precedent. The MTA had previously insisted that workers accept a three-year wage freeze.

If true, this is nowhere near the 17% the arbitration board granted, but it does break the 4% over five years deal that CSEA took.

CORRECTION - 1:50 PM: Earlier I posted that ICEUFT blog had been sent information about the city's contract offer to the PBA. That was incorrect. ICEUFT blog was simply noting a PBA ad that had been run in the Daily News that said the police had been offered the CSEA pattern of a three year wage freeze and 4% over the final two years of a five year deal.