It is irrefutable that the effect of the incomplete tax cap passed in June 2011, while politically popular and a contributor to the governor's high standing, has been disastrous for school districts and local governments. School districts have two sources of revenue: state aid and local taxes. The share of school budgets that is state aid has declined nearly 10 percent over the last decade, and the tax cap makes it far more difficult, especially in poorer districts, for localities to make up the difference from property tax levies. One of the arguments in the lawsuit is that because 60 percent of voters are needed to override the tax cap in a local school budget election, 41 percent of the voters saying no have more power than 59 percent who want to spend more. That totally distorts local control.
Sadly, we are watching a catastrophe unfold that will deeply affect many of our children at their most vulnerable ages, and which will have consequences for the rest of their lives.
The State Education Department has warned that between 100 and 200 school districts will be insolvent within two years.
That's up to a quarter of the state's school districts, with more predicted to follow. That means those schools won't be able to meet their obligations and will very likely be broken as teaching institutions as well. The multi-year highway to insolvency for many of them will be already littered with discarded teachers and administrators, dropped programs and advanced placement courses required for college admission, and cuts, cuts and more cuts impacting the core teaching mission.
Perdido 03
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Tax Cap Is Meant To Put Districts Into Crisis
From a commentary by Fred LeBrun in the Times-Union:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Having already taken over and destabilized urban school districts, edu-profiteers are now trying to sink their fangs into suburban and rural districts: this is one of their vehicles for doing so.
ReplyDeleteAnd of course it's "all for the kids..."
Delete