We have a president who has institutionalized the slaughter of thousands of innocents in the name of national security and the War on Terror.
We have a president with a personal "kill list" who orders the murder of at least one person on that list every week - again, in the name of national security and the War on Terror.
This president has declared that he has the right to assassinate any American at any time in any place for any reason - so long as the president believes this person is guilty of acts of terrorism and cannot be taken alive into custody. This declaration of extraordinary and unconstitutional powers is also made in the name of national security and the War on Terror.
This president even ordered the assassination of a 16 year old boy, an American citizen - the son of an American man who was never indicted, let alone brought to trial or convicted on any crimes, but was nonetheless killed by the American government because he was believed to be a "terrorist".
This man's son, a 16 year old boy, was later targeted by this president and killed by a drone bomb strike in Yemen. His 17 year old cousin was killed along with him.
This president's administration first lied about the ages of these boys to make the murders seem less horrific, but once caught in their lies by the Washington Post and the L.A. Times, they admitted they had killed two teenagers.
They nonetheless continue to defend these killings as justified, saying that's it too bad this kid had to die but he should've "had a more responsible father."
This kind of thing makes this president's statements on the senseless killing of another American teenager, Trayvon Martin, seem as disingenuous as they no doubt were.
In case you haven't figured out the timeline by now, this president who has engaged in the systematic slaughter of innocents, who is busy institutionalizing that slaughter so that those who come after him can continue it with legal justification in place, who seems to relish his "tough guy" role as judge, jury and executioner in the so-called War on Terror, is Barack Obama.
You know, the guy who won a Nobel Peace Prize a few years ago.
Had George W. Bush engaged in this kind of murderous behavior, liberals would have been up in arms calling for his impeachment and imprisonment.
But because the president engaging in this murderous activity is a Democrat, they remain silent, making believe they do not know what is happening.
Or worse, they justify it as practical and necessary.
I keep seeing people I respect, thoughtful people with progressive values, endorsing this murderous president as the better alternative to his opponent, Mitt Romney.
Obama is, as the cliche goes, the lesser of two evils and many people are deciding to hold their noses and vote for him under that rationale.
I cannot do that.
Barack Obama is a murderer and a war criminal.
there were justice in the world, he would be in a jail cell in
Guantanamo Bay alongside Bush, Cheney, Rice, Hadley, Rumsfeld, Yoo, et
al. having Rage Against The Machine albums blasted at him 24/7 for the
rest of his life.
But there is no justice, and so, instead many Americans are faced
with the choice of voting for him because he is the lesser of the two
evils available to us on election day.
Well, I cannot choose the lesser evil.
It’s been said before, but I’ll say it again: The lesser of two evils is still evil.
And make no mistake, Barack Obama is evil.
Just ask the relatives of the dead drone bomb victims Obama had
slaughtered in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan and elsewhere in
the name of national security and the War on Terror.