Perdido 03

Perdido 03

Monday, February 21, 2011

"Tax The Rich! Tax The Rich!"

Little Andy Cuomo got more than he bargained for during his speech in which he spewed the usual jive about state costs and taxes:

ALBANY - Gov. Cuomo's speech on Sunday night to the Association of Black and Puerto Rican Legislators was interrupted with chants of "Tax the rich!" led by City Councilman Charles Barron.

Cuomo received a warm welcome as he began to address the group, but within moments Barron (D-Brooklyn) did a Kanye West and stole the spotlight.

"Shame on you," Barron yelled at Cuomo after walking from the back of the Albany Convention Center to the front.

"Stop the cuts," Barron said.

"How are you tonight, Charles?" Cuomo said to Barron after the interruption. "I can't see who it is, but I know who it is."

Barron, a known rabble-rouser, seized the moment, yelling, "Tax the rich!"

Soon the chant caught on with a small but vocal group in the crowd of more than 500.

Cuomo's budget calls for deep cuts to education and health care spending to close the state's $10 billion deficit. He also opposes extension of the state's so-called millionaire's tax, which expires at the end of the year.

Barron and many Democratic legislators want the tax extended to help blunt many of Cuomo's proposed cuts.

Earlier, Barron described Cuomo's budget as Draconian.

"It is cutting us to the bone," Barron told the Daily News. "Tax the rich. Don't come to the table saying the only thing you're going to do is cut."

The Rev. Al Sharpton also criticized Cuomo's budget and urged lawmakers to oppose it.

Cuomo pointed to his 77% approval ratings and said he was confident the state was behind him on his policies to pursue cuts rather than higher taxes on wealthy people.

Let's see how those approval ratings look AFTER the cuts, Little Andy.

When people watch their senior centers closed, daycare programs cut, school budgets slashed to the bone, teachers laid off and class sizes heading toward 40, and parks and libraries closed all the while that the hedge fund and Wall Street criminal class continue to party like it's 1928, I bet those approval numbers don't look so good.

You see, people love to hear about cuts in the abstract, especially when they're aimed at OTHER people.

But when they start to hit home for them (as these Cuomo cuts will), it's a whole different story.

3 comments:

  1. I like it...

    "Tax the Rich!"

    and

    "Fox Lies!"

    I hope people show up this Thursday for the rally at NY's City hall.

    The media has to cover these events more and more. These protests need to go nationwide.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RBE:

    While I am a moderate, I think that eliminating the tax surcharge next year is irresponsible and needs to be extended until the State is out of the recession.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Question to Noam Chomsky on Democrat political support for public sector workers:

    http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/20110217.htm

    "So my question to you is, how exactly is it that we can get the attention of our national Democratic and progressive leaders to speak out against these measures and to help end union busting here in the United States?

    AMY GOODMAN: That was a question from Ryan Adserias in Madison, Wisconsin, where more than 10,000—some say tens of thousands of people, teachers, students, are protesting in the Capitol building, schools closed, as Ryan said. So, from Manama to Madison, from Manama, Bahrain, to Madison, Wisconsin, Noam Chomsky?

    NOAM CHOMSKY: It’s very interesting. The reason why you can’t get Democratic leaders to join is because they agree. They are also trying to destroy the unions. In fact, if you take a look at—take, say, the lame-duck session. The great achievement in the lame-duck session for which Obama is greatly praised by Democratic Party leaders is that they achieved bipartisan agreement on several measures. The most important one was the tax cut. And the issue in the tax cut—there was only one issue—should there be a tax cut for the very rich? The population was overwhelmingly against it, I think about two to one. There wasn’t even a discussion of it, they just gave it away. And the very same time, the less noticed was that Obama declared a tax increase for federal workers. Now, it wasn’t called a "tax increase"; it’s called a "freeze." But if you think for 30 seconds, a freeze on pay for a federal workers is fiscally identical to a tax increase for federal workers. And when you extend it for five years, as he said later, that means a decrease, because of population growth, inflation and so on. So he basically declared an increase in taxes for federal workers at the same time that there’s a tax decrease for the very rich.

    ReplyDelete